Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: We need your help!  (Read 7888 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kiki LaShrewd
Guest

« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2013, 08:37:22 AM »

I also would chip in!


I think I might have figured out part of the delay. If you do a google image search for "Sofia Hellqvist royaldish" pictures are still showing up from the thread that was removed about Sofia. But if you try to follow the link it will say that the topic isn't visible. However the image is shown as if it was there.

Also linked images are showing up as if they were directly posted. I did that search and a pic of Sofia's ass came up and it was from this thread. Post 92 was where Suzerain posted the link but for some reason it shows up in the google search as if it was the actual picture that was posted.
http://royaldish.com/index.php?topic=9995.90

I'll try with a few more searches of possible problem topics.
Logged
Thomas
Administrator
Medium Member
************

Reputation: 373

Offline Offline

Denmark Denmark

Posts: 953




« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2013, 08:54:46 AM »


Thank you. It's exactly that kind of images.
Logged
Kiki LaShrewd
Guest

« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2013, 09:14:07 AM »

Searched again

Topless Pippa
http://royaldish.com/index.php?topic=8238.0


If you google royaldish.com topless a topless Waity comes up yet again the pic was linked not posted. This thread was the source.
http://royaldish.com/index.php?topic=11537.420

Gag image but very revealing
http://royaldish.com/inde...topic,7625.msg283106.html

Again naked sofia is only linked but the full picture shows as if it were directly listed in the google search. Quite a few of the naked Sofia images go to that thread.
http://royaldish.com/index.php?topic=9995.0
Logged
dbc

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 396

Offline Offline

Posts: 2703





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2013, 10:16:08 AM »

I remember a poster has avatar of naked Sofia (don't remember who it is though) , I'm afraid the person doesn't visit this forum often and unaware of this problem, we can start checking every member's avatar Maria.  

I remember this as well but couldn't remember that poster's screen name. That poster hasn't posted for a while. Anyone else remembers?

I remember avatars of Letizia's underwear showing due to wind & of Kate's butt flash in a yellow dress, maybe Google are bothered by those too…?
Logged
Mille

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 960

Offline Offline

Denmark Denmark

Posts: 3438


Meary at the beach




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: October 18, 2013, 11:01:22 AM »

I´ll chip in also if RD needs some cash Thumb up
« Last Edit: October 18, 2013, 10:09:38 PM by Thomas » Logged

"She isn´t wearing ANYTHING", said a young child

The empress shuddered, for she knew that they were right, but she thought, "The procession must go on!" She carried herself even more proudly, and the chamberlains walked along behind carrying the train that wasn't there.

H.C. Andersen
Ugly Betty

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 686

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 4027





Ignore
« Reply #20 on: October 18, 2013, 09:53:28 PM »

I'd be more than happy to chip in to keep this board going strong.
Logged
My13

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 386

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 1716





Ignore
« Reply #21 on: October 19, 2013, 01:53:51 AM »

Maria, what exactly did the message from Google say? Did they say what the offensive material was? And was the message sent by a program or by a real employee? If it was automatic (not written by a human), you could email Google and tell them the robot or whatever made a mistake.

I hope you'll restore the Sofia thread when you've removed the pictures - there are a lot of good posts and info in it. Smiley
Logged
Hester
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 1996

Offline Offline

Sudan Sudan

Posts: 11054





Ignore
« Reply #22 on: October 19, 2013, 02:02:13 AM »

Maria, what exactly did the message from Google say? Did they say what the offensive material was? And was the message sent by a program or by a real employee? If it was automatic (not written by a human), you could email Google and tell them the robot or whatever made a mistake.

I hope you'll restore the Sofia thread when you've removed the pictures - there are a lot of good posts and info in it. Smiley

Are you sure this isn't part of the recently quoted "We will hunt them down" scenario regarding critics of Mary's dress sense?
Logged
Galuh

Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 1236

Offline Offline

Tuvalu Tuvalu

Posts: 8524


Mary & Michael, twins separated at birth?




Ignore
« Reply #23 on: October 19, 2013, 12:28:06 PM »

I recall the time when many porn pictures posted here by troll(s)  Dead ... seems some one is really trying hard to bring the board down.

Btw, may be someone post 'hidden porn pictures' just to draw google attention to act toward the forum. I wonder if there is such thing exist (I'm not computer savy person).
« Last Edit: October 19, 2013, 12:35:55 PM by Galuh » Logged

aravis

Small Member
****

Reputation: 71

Offline Offline

Posts: 589


Melly who? What a revolting Mortal




Ignore
« Reply #24 on: October 19, 2013, 07:11:03 PM »

 Thinking  are we sure it's google and not the royals?  or just the sofia-proctectors?
Logged
editorathome
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 1677

Offline Offline

Bouvet Island Bouvet Island

Posts: 12821





Ignore
« Reply #25 on: October 19, 2013, 07:19:09 PM »

I recall the time when many porn pictures posted here by troll(s)  Dead ... seems some one is really trying hard to bring the board down.

Btw, may be someone post 'hidden porn pictures' just to draw google attention to act toward the forum. I wonder if there is such thing exist (I'm not computer savy person).
Hmmmmm,  Thinking Thinking Thinking
Logged
Maria
Administrator
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 3149

Offline Offline

Posts: 17193




« Reply #26 on: October 19, 2013, 08:59:37 PM »

Thanks for all the support - the links, the comments and the offers to chip in. It feels good to know we've got your support Smiley

Communicating with google is rather trying We've been warned once before - back then the cause was Sofia too. I think Kiki's suggestion that it's the image search that's the problem is very likely. They simply stopped the ads with a message that we're on hold because of violation of their guidelines concerning nudity and sexually suggestive images. It would seem that once you're warned a second time, it takes a bit more to get it sorted out - it doesn't help that it's hard communicating with them Blink

The whole process is making us think a bit about how we should deal with the future of RD. It's one thing that we've signed up for a function that is helpful for the upkeep of the board - it's another when that interferes with the content of the board. While a large part of the board is to serve as a place to discuss various topics, we feel that the board has also turned into a sort of archive. Having to take down photos is quite a problem then. I don't want to overestimate the board but if in the end Sofia becomes a HRH of Sweden and the naked photos of her are removed from the internet, having them of RD would actually be quite important and it's easy to see other scenarios like that. We're thinking of how to deal with that problem. In the meantime I would suggest that everyone who has photos they feel could be in danger of having to be removed, should save them on their pc's - once we come up with a solution we can put the pictures there.
Logged
hanzo1
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 2528

Offline Offline

Costa Rica Costa Rica

Posts: 27356





Ignore
« Reply #27 on: October 19, 2013, 09:06:36 PM »

echoing everyone else be happy to help!
Logged

Are the shades of Pemberley to be thus polluted?

My13

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 386

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 1716





Ignore
« Reply #28 on: October 20, 2013, 10:34:42 PM »

Communicating with google is rather trying We've been warned once before - back then the cause was Sofia too. I think Kiki's suggestion that it's the image search that's the problem is very likely. They simply stopped the ads with a message that we're on hold because of violation of their guidelines concerning nudity and sexually suggestive images. It would seem that once you're warned a second time, it takes a bit more to get it sorted out - it doesn't help that it's hard communicating with them Blink

I'm confused - if Google's message only said that the nudity and sexually suggestive images guideline was violated, how do we know it was the Sofia pictures? Either way, it sounds like Google isn't communicating clearly.

The whole process is making us think a bit about how we should deal with the future of RD. It's one thing that we've signed up for a function that is helpful for the upkeep of the board - it's another when that interferes with the content of the board. While a large part of the board is to serve as a place to discuss various topics, we feel that the board has also turned into a sort of archive.

Well said, I hope you can find a solution. Smiley
Logged
AliCat
Board Helper
Gigantic Member
************

Reputation: 402

Offline Offline

Sweden Sweden

Posts: 4249





Ignore
« Reply #29 on: December 31, 2013, 10:13:12 AM »

I found some pics of Kate's bare t**s and a** on page 43 in the camera hungry eyes thread, if google is interested Wink
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: