|
Miss Waynfleet
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: November 07, 2010, 01:09:31 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Waynfleet
|
|
« Reply #31 on: November 07, 2010, 01:11:24 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RoyalDish.com
|
|
« Reply #31 on: November 07, 2010, 01:11:24 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poptart
|
|
« Reply #32 on: November 07, 2010, 01:13:01 AM » |
|
wasn't Paul a fag, too ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Waynfleet
|
|
« Reply #34 on: November 07, 2010, 01:25:49 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poptart
|
|
« Reply #35 on: November 07, 2010, 01:27:06 AM » |
|
Excuse me, Miss W.,....I perhaps should have asked "wasn't His Majesty, King Paul a fag, too ?" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Waynfleet
|
|
« Reply #36 on: November 07, 2010, 01:29:52 AM » |
|
Excuse me, Miss W.,....I perhaps should have asked "wasn't His Majesty, King Paul a fag, too ?" Better   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poptart
|
|
« Reply #37 on: November 07, 2010, 01:33:11 AM » |
|
Tak...Tak......  .....where would we be without the fags to laugh at......right Jokey ?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Waynfleet
|
|
« Reply #38 on: November 07, 2010, 01:37:29 AM » |
|
Joachim?  Maybe Alexandra left him because he had an affair with a guy. And that made her more furious than if he had one with a woman?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poptart
|
|
« Reply #39 on: November 07, 2010, 01:39:51 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Waynfleet
|
|
« Reply #40 on: November 07, 2010, 01:48:23 AM » |
|
Didnīt some people say Hendrik is gay, too?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poptart
|
|
« Reply #41 on: November 07, 2010, 01:49:43 AM » |
|
Didnīt some people say Hendrik is gay, too?
It has been said, I believe. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Waynfleet
|
|
« Reply #42 on: November 07, 2010, 04:20:21 PM » |
|
I looked at TRF and found a topic about Gay Royals and must laugh about this fool member:
I am gay, and if I was a absolute monarch I would first marry a woman. Have children. Divorce the woman and marry my partner. That way I have provided a heir to the throne. As well as a spare.
I would hire a woman who was a virgin to be surrogate mother to my children. She would be paid very well for all of this and the marriage would be set up as a business deal. Once the children were born we would negotiate a divorce so that I could marry my partner. I would give my ex-wife a Dukedom of some sort. She would be treated more kinder than Princess Diana and we would remain friends. Since I would be absolute I would have my partner legally adopt the children.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poptart
|
|
« Reply #43 on: November 07, 2010, 04:21:39 PM » |
|
I looked at TRF and found a topic about Gay Royals and must laugh about this fool member:
I am gay, and if I was a absolute monarch I would first marry a woman. Have children. Divorce the woman and marry my partner. That way I have provided a heir to the throne. As well as a spare.
I would hire a woman who was a virgin to be surrogate mother to my children. She would be paid very well for all of this and the marriage would be set up as a business deal. Once the children were born we would negotiate a divorce so that I could marry my partner. I would give my ex-wife a Dukedom of some sort. She would be treated more kinder than Princess Diana and we would remain friends. Since I would be absolute I would have my partner legally adopt the children.
sounds a bit familiar...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Waynfleet
|
|
« Reply #44 on: November 07, 2010, 04:23:29 PM » |
|
I bet some Kings did that, too without divorce. But how he wrote that.  She must be a virgin. Why not adopt a nephew? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RoyalDish.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
