Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 07:21:49 PM 
Started by PeDe - Last post by pixiecat
Princess Charlene published some photos of Jacques and Gabriella at the market this morning; the photos are on her instagram

I like a lot these childre

https://www.instagram.com...en-by=hshprincesscharlene






thanks Mylady Thumb up Star
here the pics











wonderful pics  Icecream, on the 6th one, jacques looks like a true model  


Such darling children. 

 2 
 on: Today at 07:19:14 PM 
Started by Maria - Last post by Hibou
Here in the US, Saturday Night Live did a Will & Harry skit. Harry jokes about Will's haircut and Will points out that SNL and Meghan's show Suits are both American shows but that people actually watch SNL.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0yYTNrP_38





I thought it was "biting" sarcasm, especially for Harry and the mocking of Suits.  SNL has a way of making sharp remarks in the name of fun.

I almost fell off the couch watching this, they got the nose, overbite, huge teeth perfect!!! 

 3 
 on: Today at 07:11:38 PM 
Started by PeDe - Last post by Oh_Caroline
They're just too cute.   

 4 
 on: Today at 07:05:31 PM 
Started by wisdomheaven - Last post by pixiecat
Pixie Cat : Yasss!!!!! My thoughts exactly. I feel that all Meghan did was trying to copy women with success - like Gwyneth Paltrow. Didn't she say that she's a huge fan?

The Tig, yoga and her so called lifestyle, I don't have a hard time imaging where that came from. And the charity thing is so Angelina. Has she ever said she was an Angie fan?

At 36, the best thing she had achieved was Suits. Maybe she could play the big sister or mom in some soap series in the future, but that's all she had going for her imo.

Pre Harry did we ever see any pictures of her at Golden Globe etc? Did the media even write about her?


Yep.  IIRC, she said she was a big Gwyneth fan.  I don't recall her saying anything about Angelina Jolie, but her actions seem Jolie-inspired.

I'm in the US, and prior to being associated with Harry, I had never, ever seen her mentioned in the media.  Suits wasn't a popular show here.  It is on a basic cable network that produces a lot of original shows, and none of those shows have gotten a lot of media attention.  In the States, the buzzed-about shows tend to be on HBO, Netflix, Amazon, and occasionally on the three major networks (occasionally).  The USA network is not one of those major networks.

I don't recall ever seeing her at the Golden Globes, and I don't believe any of the USA network's shows were nominated for a Globe.  Suits itself was nominated for less known awards, and two of the actors were nominated for less known awards, but not Sparkles herself.

Without Harry, she would have continued being semi-unknown in the US, IMO unless she were to have gotten a big role in a big movie or popular show.
Thanks for clarifying Smiley I stayed in NY myself a few years ago, and like you said, I can't recall reading much about Suits. In fact, the only reason I started watching the show, was because of Netflix. I didn't like it though - husband watched it for three seasons, but eventually he too felt it wasn't that great.

I've read somewhere that although she wasn't famous in US, she used to be a thing in Canada.

Just look at her friend circle, it's not like she has any B or C celeb friends. The only one I recognized (and that's because I find her very pretty and I follow her to  get inspired for makeup styles that fits Indian skin) is Priyanka Chopra. She's big in India, in the US not so much...

Her list of bfs never included any actors or celebs either, so yeah, I too feel Harry was her lucky star. With him, she'll always have access to money and diamonds, and in her head, she'll probably think she'll sparkle forever. I hate the, grace comparisons, though. Grace was beautiful and a big star - Sparkles is so far from it. The only thing they have in common is that Sparkles tried to succeed in Hollywood.

She was famous in Canada.  She had a clothing line at a Canadian department store.  I'm not sure how many collections she "designed" for them, but there was a Meghan Markle line at that store at one point in time.  I've always wondered how that came about since Meghan didn't have any background in fashion and wasn't all that famous.  I know Jessica Simpson had a line of clothing and shoes; but Jessica was very, very famous. It reminds of me Sofia of Sweden and her yoga gear.  I don't think Sofia was hugely famous in Sweden, but was probably more famous than Meghan.  Pharrell Williams is another person who comes to mind who "designed" clothing or shoes-but like the others, he was already very famous.

It's kind of odd to me.  Usually Americans who are popular in Canada are also popular in the States, but for whatever reason, she just wasn't popular here. I think it had to do with the lack of visibility of Suits in the States.


 5 
 on: Today at 06:53:47 PM 
Started by HRN - Last post by jessmie
It a ridiculous rule anyway. I would argue that it made sense in the very past when royal families were powerful and wanted to create alliances but it definitely doesn't make sense now in the age of the internet.

After the 30s and with the way communication was spreading, there would always be a possibility that embarrassing stories about royal spouses would be printed. The press, then, would be more discreet but then if we go back two generations, the Danish royals always chose their spouses carefully!
Ingrid was Swedish BUT she was a princess so of course there would be no embarrassing stories about her, Henrik was French and from a good family albeit social climbers, late Richard was German and from a noble family, yet that didn't stop the press writing all about his family's Nazi connections and Constantine is Greek and he is/was a royal. The only mavericks from that generation are, Harald, who insisted on marrying Sonja who came from a working-class family, and Beatrix, who married Claus, despite all the overwhelming evidence of Nazi connections and participation in the Nazi regime, even though he didn't believe in it and had to be member of the youth organisations since he was a young German man. All the other royal spouses of that generation who became queens were either royal themselves (Sofia), from nobility (Fabiola and Paola) or were commoners, but came from money (Silvia and Marie-Therese).

It has only been for Frederik and Joachim's generation that they should worry about salacious stories of past boyfriends, gossip etc, and that's inevitable because of the internet and the countless of tabloids around the world. Of course, Joachim, both times made wise choices in whom to marry, and there weren't any stories about embarrassing relatives friends and boyfriends of Alexandra or Marie (I think), but we all got to enjoy the leeches that are John Donaldson and Amber Petty. Mary's siblings have at least been a bit more dignified.

If it were Katja's lingerie modelling pictures that were an additional problem, all I have to say is that in the recent years we have seen more of Mary than we ever hoped to see! At least, if Fred had stood his ground, he would have been much happier and the Danes would have a lovely Crown Princess who spoke fluent Danish and was interest in conservation and art and not just in fashion and botox!

 6 
 on: Today at 06:50:59 PM 
Started by wisdomheaven - Last post by Katestolemyname
Pixie Cat : Yasss!!!!! My thoughts exactly. I feel that all Meghan did was trying to copy women with success - like Gwyneth Paltrow. Didn't she say that she's a huge fan?

The Tig, yoga and her so called lifestyle, I don't have a hard time imaging where that came from. And the charity thing is so Angelina. Has she ever said she was an Angie fan?

At 36, the best thing she had achieved was Suits. Maybe she could play the big sister or mom in some soap series in the future, but that's all she had going for her imo.

Pre Harry did we ever see any pictures of her at Golden Globe etc? Did the media even write about her?


Yep.  IIRC, she said she was a big Gwyneth fan.  I don't recall her saying anything about Angelina Jolie, but her actions seem Jolie-inspired.

I'm in the US, and prior to being associated with Harry, I had never, ever seen her mentioned in the media.  Suits wasn't a popular show here.  It is on a basic cable network that produces a lot of original shows, and none of those shows have gotten a lot of media attention.  In the States, the buzzed-about shows tend to be on HBO, Netflix, Amazon, and occasionally on the three major networks (occasionally).  The USA network is not one of those major networks.

I don't recall ever seeing her at the Golden Globes, and I don't believe any of the USA network's shows were nominated for a Globe.  Suits itself was nominated for less known awards, and two of the actors were nominated for less known awards, but not Sparkles herself.

Without Harry, she would have continued being semi-unknown in the US, IMO unless she were to have gotten a big role in a big movie or popular show.
Thanks for clarifying Smiley I stayed in NY myself a few years ago, and like you said, I can't recall reading much about Suits. In fact, the only reason I started watching the show, was because of Netflix. I didn't like it though - husband watched it for three seasons, but eventually he too felt it wasn't that great.

I've read somewhere that although she wasn't famous in US, she used to be a thing in Canada.

Just look at her friend circle, it's not like she has any B or C celeb friends. The only one I recognized (and that's because I find her very pretty and I follow her to  get inspired for makeup styles that fits Indian skin) is Priyanka Chopra. She's big in India, in the US not so much...

Her list of bfs never included any actors or celebs either, so yeah, I too feel Harry was her lucky star. With him, she'll always have access to money and diamonds, and in her head, she'll probably think she'll sparkle forever. I hate the, grace comparisons, though. Grace was beautiful and a big star - Sparkles is so far from it. The only thing they have in common is that Sparkles tried to succeed in Hollywood.

 7 
 on: Today at 06:44:00 PM 
Started by PeDe - Last post by Tatini
These kids are the picture of happiness!!! They are both gorgeous: Jacques is all Wittstock, while Gabriella is a mini Grace 

 8 
 on: Today at 06:42:10 PM 
Started by wisdomheaven - Last post by pixiecat
Pixie Cat : Yasss!!!!! My thoughts exactly. I feel that all Meghan did was trying to copy women with success - like Gwyneth Paltrow. Didn't she say that she's a huge fan?

The Tig, yoga and her so called lifestyle, I don't have a hard time imaging where that came from. And the charity thing is so Angelina. Has she ever said she was an Angie fan?

At 36, the best thing she had achieved was Suits. Maybe she could play the big sister or mom in some soap series in the future, but that's all she had going for her imo.

Pre Harry did we ever see any pictures of her at Golden Globe etc? Did the media even write about her?


Yep.  IIRC, she said she was a big Gwyneth fan.  I don't recall her saying anything about Angelina Jolie, but her actions seem Jolie-inspired.

I'm in the US, and prior to being associated with Harry, I had never, ever seen her mentioned in the media.  Suits wasn't a popular show here.  It is on a basic cable network that produces a lot of original shows, and none of those shows have gotten a lot of media attention.  In the States, the buzzed-about shows tend to be on HBO, Netflix, Amazon, and occasionally on the three major networks (occasionally).  The USA network is not one of those major networks.

I don't recall ever seeing her at the Golden Globes, and I don't believe any of the USA network's shows were nominated for a Globe.  Suits itself was nominated for less known awards, and two of the actors were nominated for less known awards, but not Sparkles herself.

Without Harry, she would have continued being semi-unknown in the US, IMO unless she were to have gotten a big role in a big movie or popular show.

 9 
 on: Today at 06:40:40 PM 
Started by wisdomheaven - Last post by onar
If Harry was a normal guy from Toronto she never would be with him, we all know this.
Plus she is much smarter than him. This union would have never happened in normal life.
He is desperate and dull and she took her last train to money and fame. That's it pretty much.
Of course she is not happy with him now, he is getting on her nerves..it is pretty obvious. When the ring is on her finger and she has her first and only child, she will start to get out.  

My estimation:
in 2 years: she will have a secret lover
in 3 years: secret separation
in 4 years: announcement of the divorce
in 5 years : divorce and she will be with a multimillionaire

 Halo
I'm not a fan of divorce predictions simply because we used to say the same about S of Sweden and here she is, with a second baby. And I don't have any negative feelings about the babies but she will never leave. The same applies on other occasions in royal families.

I don't think anybody here has any negative feelings about CP and Sofia's babies.  Shocked  Confused

Getting back on topic, I agree with Spoonie.  Sparkles isn't going anywhere.  She was working in an industry in which she hadn't cracked the elite levels.  She is thirty-six years old and in that industry, a thirty-six year old woman had only a few years left before she would find herself being passed over for younger women.  She was also known for taking part in things that were already done by and associated with more successful women (the lifestyle blog, the humanitarian work, the Canadian clothing line).  She got into this relationship at the right time, career-wise.
Pixie, I didn't even imply anything like that. I only clarified my point of view.

 10 
 on: Today at 06:12:41 PM 
Started by wisdomheaven - Last post by Katestolemyname
Pixie Cat : Yasss!!!!! My thoughts exactly. I feel that all Meghan did was trying to copy women with success - like Gwyneth Paltrow. Didn't she say that she's a huge fan?

The Tig, yoga and her so called lifestyle, I don't have a hard time imaging where that came from. And the charity thing is so Angelina. Has she ever said she was an Angie fan?

At 36, the best thing she had achieved was Suits. Maybe she could play the big sister or mom in some soap series in the future, but that's all she had going for her imo.

Pre Harry did we ever see any pictures of her at Golden Globe etc? Did the media even write about her?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10