Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
 11 
 on: Today at 05:17:09 PM 
Started by Georgie - Last post by Lord Gˇn
Deleted

 12 
 on: Today at 05:12:22 PM 
Started by Principessa - Last post by Lord Gˇn
Lordalmighty! I read this yesterday and I just didn't want to draw more attention on her: " ...for almost a decade I wasn't allowed to do anything back home..." She was kept and fed in a candy house in the forest,poor Gretsy! Sooo, she did nothing for almost a decade and got good benefit from that long period of idleness.   She could have polished the silverware ,walked the pets or do some gardening, given a hand to her MIL or started some new projects. Not to mention looking after her kids and husband and carrying out her duties as a princess. Had she been vetoed?

 13 
 on: Today at 05:09:52 PM 
Started by Rearden - Last post by Lady Liebe
https://www.dailymail.co....issy-Teigen-meltdown.html

WTH? It’s like some Pandora’s box has been opened after that shower. Please STAHP, Beatrice. Conduct unbecoming of a “blood princess.”


Weird, and slightly creepy. Dignity Beatrice, dignity.

 14 
 on: Today at 05:02:38 PM 
Started by danifaul - Last post by Oh_Caroline
Maybe it isn't that the staff aren't doing their job, maybe the principals just won't listen? Just like when Me-again does something against protocol, people take that as evidence that there is no protocol when it's more than likely she's just sticking two fingers up to it.

That's what I'm leaning towards which will make it very hard to hire and retain excellent staff (or really any staff).

 15 
 on: Today at 04:56:54 PM 
Started by danifaul - Last post by Lady G
Maybe it isn't that the staff aren't doing their job, maybe the principals just won't listen? Just like when Me-again does something against protocol, people take that as evidence that there is no protocol when it's more than likely she's just sticking two fingers up to it.

 16 
 on: Today at 04:52:55 PM 
Started by Georgie - Last post by Lady Liebe
HM and Charles have to be careful. The public haven't totally turned against her and she can still play the race card very easily. They know the power of an attractive, sympathetic woman crying to the press about how badly treated she is - they've lived it. If they are smart they'll play the long game - Me-again isn't here for the duration and eventually she will trip herself up. There's also a child to consider - one who will always be part of their family.

I think the family will let the press have at her first. As you said, they 'll play the long game. Then after the baby is born they'll wait until she does something that crosses a line and she'll be gone. Who knows, Meghan may do it purposefully if she decides it's time and thinks she can control the PR. The baby will stay mainly with Harry I think, because I cannot see Meghan remaining in England. She'll be back to the states ASAP.

AFAIK it will take her 5 years to get Right to Remain as a non citizen with a Brit partner - if that is what she wants - so she needs to be married to him for that time .... maybe they have fast tracked her


So would it be better for her to be a Brit if a divorce takes place? I really don't think she'd stay in England. Her press is better in the US, she's very popular in the states and the 'poor, poor Meghan has been done wrong' would get her farther here than in Britain.

Does anyone know where the majority of her stans are from?

 17 
 on: Today at 04:49:36 PM 
Started by Kemenate - Last post by Oh_Caroline
There is a reason she was the most google celebrity woman of 2016...no one knew who she was.

 18 
 on: Today at 04:47:18 PM 
Started by danifaul - Last post by Oh_Caroline
IMVHO, I don't think Samantha is doing all that well as their private secretary; I don't see why this is good news for them.

All the negative Sparkles PR has happened on her watch.  The failure to handle her father and her other family members has happened on her watch.  The pap walk and invited press coverage took place on her watch.  I'm not so sure keeping Samantha on is all that beneficial to the Sussex's. She doesn't seem to be advising Sparkles well on how best to transition from D-list actress to a member of a royal family.  She doesn't seem to be advising Hazmat on how best to advise and help his wife as a member of a royal family. 

 Unless, of course, Samantha does not object to Sparkles' outrageous demands or she is slyly trying to bring Sparkles down from the inside.  Which, if that's the case, then keep on, keepin on Sam.

I agree.  I think that what Harry needs is really someone former military both since military is/was his big thing and because he did better with ELF.  But no one is going to want to put up with the personal PR schemes, lack of caring about the role, and "what Meghan wants, Meghan gets".  If anyone is advising Meghan it's pretty clear that she doesn't care.  Maybe Meghan isn't telling them everything they need to do their jobs or even enjoys the circus act.

Part of me even wonders if the past few days aren't a sign of her exit strategy.  She doesn't need Harry any more...she always get headlines as Meghan, Duchess of Sussex or even once remarried as Meghan whatever mother of HRH Prince(ss) Givenchy of Sussex.  It's pretty clear that she's had no desire to learn about her role as a royal just a desire to latch onto the celebrity aspects.

I hope to god that the royals use damn good attorneys in the divorce.  Can't wait to see who files and what the reason is...unless they wait for the no fault option to become law which the justice secretary is introducing in the next session of parliament.  There's a bill before parliament right now and among other thing would make prenups and postnups legally binding.

 19 
 on: Today at 04:45:52 PM 
Started by Georgie - Last post by dwi
The saddest part to me is her having no family support I don’t know what I would do without my extended family on both sides

lots of people don't have family support.  i am one of those.  however, it can make you a much stronger person.  you have to depend on yourself, which isn't always easy. 
do i wish i had that sort of supportive family?  sure, but nothing is perfect in life, and you just have to deal with it and make your own way.  on top of it all, i was an only child.

my adoptive parents had large families, but they weren't really that close to them, so i rarely spent time with their families.  my mom died when i was 16, and my father when i was 32.  my relationship w/ my dad wasn't close because after my mom died we were estranged until i graduated from undergrad. 

 20 
 on: Today at 04:41:36 PM 
Started by Rearden - Last post by Night Blooming Jasmine
https://www.dailymail.co....issy-Teigen-meltdown.html

WTH? It’s like some Pandora’s box has been opened after that shower. Please STAHP, Beatrice. Conduct unbecoming of a “blood princess.”

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10