Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
 21 
 on: Today at 04:47:18 PM 
Started by danifaul - Last post by Oh_Caroline
IMVHO, I don't think Samantha is doing all that well as their private secretary; I don't see why this is good news for them.

All the negative Sparkles PR has happened on her watch.  The failure to handle her father and her other family members has happened on her watch.  The pap walk and invited press coverage took place on her watch.  I'm not so sure keeping Samantha on is all that beneficial to the Sussex's. She doesn't seem to be advising Sparkles well on how best to transition from D-list actress to a member of a royal family.  She doesn't seem to be advising Hazmat on how best to advise and help his wife as a member of a royal family. 

 Unless, of course, Samantha does not object to Sparkles' outrageous demands or she is slyly trying to bring Sparkles down from the inside.  Which, if that's the case, then keep on, keepin on Sam.

I agree.  I think that what Harry needs is really someone former military both since military is/was his big thing and because he did better with ELF.  But no one is going to want to put up with the personal PR schemes, lack of caring about the role, and "what Meghan wants, Meghan gets".  If anyone is advising Meghan it's pretty clear that she doesn't care.  Maybe Meghan isn't telling them everything they need to do their jobs or even enjoys the circus act.

Part of me even wonders if the past few days aren't a sign of her exit strategy.  She doesn't need Harry any more...she always get headlines as Meghan, Duchess of Sussex or even once remarried as Meghan whatever mother of HRH Prince(ss) Givenchy of Sussex.  It's pretty clear that she's had no desire to learn about her role as a royal just a desire to latch onto the celebrity aspects.

I hope to god that the royals use damn good attorneys in the divorce.  Can't wait to see who files and what the reason is...unless they wait for the no fault option to become law which the justice secretary is introducing in the next session of parliament.  There's a bill before parliament right now and among other thing would make prenups and postnups legally binding.

 22 
 on: Today at 04:45:52 PM 
Started by Georgie - Last post by dwi
The saddest part to me is her having no family support I don’t know what I would do without my extended family on both sides

lots of people don't have family support.  i am one of those.  however, it can make you a much stronger person.  you have to depend on yourself, which isn't always easy. 
do i wish i had that sort of supportive family?  sure, but nothing is perfect in life, and you just have to deal with it and make your own way.  on top of it all, i was an only child.

my adoptive parents had large families, but they weren't really that close to them, so i rarely spent time with their families.  my mom died when i was 16, and my father when i was 32.  my relationship w/ my dad wasn't close because after my mom died we were estranged until i graduated from undergrad. 

 23 
 on: Today at 04:41:36 PM 
Started by Rearden - Last post by Night Blooming Jasmine
https://www.dailymail.co....issy-Teigen-meltdown.html

WTH? It’s like some Pandora’s box has been opened after that shower. Please STAHP, Beatrice. Conduct unbecoming of a “blood princess.”

 24 
 on: Today at 04:34:03 PM 
Started by danifaul - Last post by Lady Liebe
IMVHO, I don't think Samantha is doing all that well as their private secretary; I don't see why this is good news for them.

All the negative Sparkles PR has happened on her watch.  The failure to handle her father and her other family members has happened on her watch.  The pap walk and invited press coverage took place on her watch.  I'm not so sure keeping Samantha on is all that beneficial to the Sussex's. She doesn't seem to be advising Sparkles well on how best to transition from D-list actress to a member of a royal family.  She doesn't seem to be advising Hazmat on how best to advise and help his wife as a member of a royal family. 

 Unless, of course, Samantha does not object to Sparkles' outrageous demands or she is slyly trying to bring Sparkles down from the inside.  Which, if that's the case, then keep on, keepin on Sam.

I think you may be on to something! Wink

 25 
 on: Today at 04:26:36 PM 
Started by Georgie - Last post by Lady Liebe
I find the photos of the children with cancer smelling the flowers particularly disturbing. I was ok with her "firing emails at 5am" (whatever, staff should just read them at nine), spraying febreeze all over the church in windsor and even the father drama llama letter, but this has sickened me. This is not going to end up well.

What I find amazing is that they usually don't allow flowers in Children's hospitals because many children have allergies and flowers can actually cause respiratory issues.  They have to be very careful where those flowers go. It's like bringing in peanuts to a hospital.  When children are sick their immune systems are weak and the last thing they need are flowers. JMO

 ::goodpost::Flowers for kids?? Small toys and balloons are more in order. She's tone deaf and a user.

Our local hospice also repurposes flower arrangements and  distributes them to their patients. It's done by volunteers. For free.

 26 
 on: Today at 04:25:36 PM 
Started by Princess MS - Last post by lynda
I'll just apologize now for the embarrassment sure to come.  I'm so sorry  he'll be inflicted on  you (but if you could manage to keep him there I'd really appreciate it). 

  I hope someone takes the time to explain  he won't be in Europe but  he'll probably claim, fake news  Wink

Thank you Countess of Cows................I agree.......PLEASE keep #45 .we do NOT  want him back..............I am sure #45 would want to take a very long visit to your very hot/warmest spot.he really doesn't need any cable TV..just some history books....no A/C or other human contacts.........and NO twitter account


 

 27 
 on: Today at 04:25:09 PM 
Started by PeDe - Last post by pixiecat
They've been skiing in Verbier







Is that a nanny on the lift with them?  Roll Eyes.

And of course Fred is nowhere near Mary, but instead is hanging around his friends, who've been dragged along, yet again.

 28 
 on: Today at 04:23:43 PM 
Started by Georgie - Last post by Flanagan
Omid on twitter:  'The flowers went to @repeatroses (who give previously-used arrangements to hospitals, hospices, nursing homes, cancer treatment centres). @JZEvents did an awesome job!  @RepeatRoses have shared photos of the colourful arrangements created at Meghan’s baby shower for @rmhnewyork. As a home away from home for children and families fighting cancer (up to eight months), the flowers have now been placed in each of the
patient rooms'

@GayleKing says guests made flower arrangements at Meghan Markle's baby shower that @RepeatRoses donated to different charities. "It just speaks to who she is."








I've got a strong stomach when it comes to royal watching but there is something super exploitative and super cynical about releasing those photos  No

 Star   FC you said what I was thinking so much better than I could - I was repulsed by those pictures  No

 29 
 on: Today at 04:21:18 PM 
Started by danifaul - Last post by Antevorta
IMVHO, I don't think Samantha is doing all that well as their private secretary; I don't see why this is good news for them.

All the negative Sparkles PR has happened on her watch.  The failure to handle her father and her other family members has happened on her watch.  The pap walk and invited press coverage took place on her watch.  I'm not so sure keeping Samantha on is all that beneficial to the Sussex's. She doesn't seem to be advising Sparkles well on how best to transition from D-list actress to a member of a royal family.  She doesn't seem to be advising Hazmat on how best to advise and help his wife as a member of a royal family. 

 Unless, of course, Samantha does not object to Sparkles' outrageous demands or she is slyly trying to bring Sparkles down from the inside.  Which, if that's the case, then keep on, keepin on Sam.

 30 
 on: Today at 04:21:11 PM 
Started by Kemenate - Last post by fogdancer
Suits is filmed in Toronto and it is a tacky glamour show and there aren't many of those being filmed in that city. Meghan is into fashion and Jessica is a "stylist" so I can see how they could meet up and get to know each other at functions. Jessica's family is also super wealthy and are well known in Canada as well.

Tacky glamour show? Not really, it was a drama about a lawyer and a wanna be lawyer, it wasn’t really about glamour at all.  The core was the Harvey/Mike dynamic, everyone else was incidental to that.  Well, apart from Louis Litt, he was pretty important, the rest of them could have been any actor.
Gina Torres' acting chops were good enough to bag her a spin-off series. She is one of only two actors nominated for any awards for SUITS. Lumping her with Mediocre Meghan is a  travesty.  I am baffled by Meghan’s role in SUITS – very little  chemistry between Rachel and Mike – just a whole lot of emotional angst.

I forgot Gina, my bad.  She’s a super actress, loved her since her Firefly days and she was amazing in Hannibal.  But yes, much as I loved Suits, Rachel was always an annoyance to me, irritating character played by a mediocre actress.

In Brazil my country she only got the spot lights the second after the engagement, the TV show she was working in isn't well known here, few people do. So she is the famous 'actress" who?!
Never had the guts to watch her acting, she never had an important play in Broadway or an Oscar or Baftas she dreams on ... poor moron. The three episodes she had some attention: having sex in archives area, a blow j and her wearing a wedding gown, done that's it.
On the other hand Merryl Streep, Jennifer Lawrence are US citizens and we'll known around the globe because of their performances. Oliver Platt third grade cousin of your late MIL won 11 awards and nominations... Just to mention a few of some hard working people who won an Oscar:

1939 Hattie McDaniel for Gone With the Wind.
1963 Sidney Poitier for Lilies of the Field.
1982 Louis Gossett, Jr. for An Officer and a Gentlemen.
1989 Denzel Washington for Glory.
1990 Whoopi Goldberg for Ghost.
1996 Cuba Gooding, Jr. ...
2001 Denzel Washington for Training Day.
2001 Halle Berry for Monster's Ball.
2004  Jamie Foxx for Ray

          Best Actor

 2004  Morgan Freeman for Million Dollar Baby

          Best Supporting Actor

 2006  Forest Whitaker for The Last King of Scotland

          Best Actor

 2006  Jennifer Hudson for Dreamgirls

          Best Supporting Actress

 2009  Mo’Nique for Precious

          Best Supporting Actress

 2011  Octavia Spencer for The Help

          Best Supporting Actress

 2014  Lupita Nyong’o for 12 Years a Slave

Oh Sorry Rachel Meghan your oh holy name isn't on the list, damn it!

Yes nobody knew about her, and she doesn't make the world stop spinning, plus she is always craddling her bump, is she afraid of let it fall off?
Extremely expensive purses/bags wearing a bobcat?
Yes she is an massive disaster. I have just one Victor Hugo purse it was a second hand gift for me, and I don't dare to use it without makeup, high heels, wearing a dress or other formal clothes. I am thinking on sending to Imelda a Nike or Adidas bag to fit that bobcap.
Can't deny she got the lame lights, duh Serena and Venus are hell ugly, no money can change that and in what on Earth they change anything, Beyonce is also ugly without all that makeup and Photoshop plus plastic surgeries.
Girls club orchestrated by Jessica another de bish.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10