Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sarah wearing wedding rings  (Read 25171 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
willywonka85

Mini Member
***

Reputation: 52

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 305





Ignore
« Reply #30 on: April 25, 2012, 11:38:08 AM »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1427360.stm

They changed his statues from divorced to widowed, so he can remarry AFAIK and the church played the game, too because itīs "religious law" Under civil law he is divorced and not widowed.

I brought this up on the  Sugar Boards a while back and nearly had my ass set afire by a couple of Camilla shills. I KNEW that Charles had changed his status to that of a "widower" at the time of his marriage, and the Camilla bitches over there called me uninformed at best and a liar at worst. They never wanted to admit that Charles acknowledged-at least in the eyes of the CoE-that he had never been divorced from Diana under religious law.

GAWD I hate most of the posters over there.  Ranting

Thanks for vindicating me, Miss W!!  Hug  Banana

Where in that article does it say that 'Charles changed his status'?  The article says that in the eyes of the Church of England he became a widower after Diana's death, not that Charles went around intentionally changing his marital status.  It changed automatically when his former spouse died, as far as the Church is concerned.

Given that Camilla's former husband is still alive, and each played a part in the marital failures of the other, it's frankly irrelevant that the Church designated Charles a widower.  They still couldn't get married in a CoE church, and as far as I can see Charles has never denied that he and Diana divorced.
Logged
KittyHeaven

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 593

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 4435





Ignore
« Reply #31 on: April 25, 2012, 04:46:55 PM »

I should have stated my sentence differently. Charles didn't change his status himself...but his status did indeed change.

Anyway...the point I am making is that in the eyes of the Church he was a widower at the time of his marriage to Camilla, willywonka85. I don't have the inclination or the time to discuss the finer points of Anglican canon law or who was at fault in the Wales marital fiasco.

.
Logged
Princess Tia

Small Member
****

Reputation: 175

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 520





Ignore
« Reply #32 on: April 26, 2012, 02:26:09 AM »

Aww, Kitty, so sorry.  Here's a comfort pat on the head and a Star given to you for meritorious effort for attempting to speak the truth elsewhere.  A Star, also to Miss Way for the article to set it all straight.  And a Thumb down for those for those who treated our Miss Kitty unkindly.
Logged
ronda

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 494

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 2321





Ignore
« Reply #33 on: April 26, 2012, 04:49:20 PM »

It might be something within that millieu as Charles wore his wedding band to Diana, with his signet ring, until the day he announced his engagement to Camilla.

Really?  I did not know that.  I am not sure how I feel towards that though....I think wedding rings should only be worn if married.  Call me old fashioned, but it is also worse to continue to wear the wedding ring of a marriage which infidelity took place, as well as an untimely death.

Perhaps they just do not want to part with their nice wedding rings, particularly the expensive gold, specifically made welsh bands.

I'm confused, isn't she still living and banging Andrew at their mansion the Queen built for them? 
               



  tudorfan,  I think it's more like she is still living and  banging andrew at Royal Lodge in Windsor where she still lives with the total idiot. !!!    Laugh bounce         
Logged

Smiley...Knowledge is Power...Smiley
KittyHeaven

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 593

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 4435





Ignore
« Reply #34 on: April 26, 2012, 04:51:31 PM »

Aww, Kitty, so sorry.  Here's a comfort pat on the head and a Star given to you for meritorious effort for attempting to speak the truth elsewhere.  A Star, also to Miss Way for the article to set it all straight.  And a Thumb down for those for those who treated our Miss Kitty unkindly.


Awww...thank you darling!!!  Hug  Star
Logged
BigSunnies

Mini Member
***

Reputation: 87

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 242





Ignore
« Reply #35 on: June 09, 2012, 01:17:50 PM »

It might be something within that millieu as Charles wore his wedding band to Diana, with his signet ring, until the day he announced his engagement to Camilla.

Really?  I did not know that.  I am not sure how I feel towards that though....I think wedding rings should only be worn if married.  Call me old fashioned, but it is also worse to continue to wear the wedding ring of a marriage which infidelity took place, as well as an untimely death.

Perhaps they just do not want to part with their nice wedding rings, particularly the expensive gold, specifically made welsh bands.

I'm confused, isn't she still living and banging Andrew at their mansion the Queen built for them? 
               



  tudorfan,  I think it's more like she is still living and  banging andrew at Royal Lodge in Windsor where she still lives with the total idiot. !!!    Laugh bounce         



EEEeeeeeWwwwwwwww

After all the allegations as to her selling herself to rich arabs !

Not very fussy, those Windsor men, are they


Charles didn't mind sloppy seconds either, re: Camilla, apparently

But then you know what they say about men who choose to share women and closet homosexuality
Logged
StephanieDesiree

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 396

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2042





Ignore
« Reply #36 on: June 09, 2012, 01:41:58 PM »

I'm just shocked to learn that Sarah hasn't pawned them.
Logged
BigSunnies

Mini Member
***

Reputation: 87

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 242





Ignore
« Reply #37 on: June 09, 2012, 02:16:52 PM »

I'm just shocked to learn that Sarah hasn't pawned them.


LOL    Beer
Logged
midnightblue711

Micro Member
**

Reputation: 17

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 177





Ignore
« Reply #38 on: June 10, 2012, 09:43:38 AM »

She gets more from keeping the rings, she is still an albatross around the neck of the BRF. 
Logged
Fragrance78

Large Member
******

Reputation: 225

Offline Offline

Malaysia Malaysia

Posts: 1449





Ignore
« Reply #39 on: June 10, 2012, 11:49:34 AM »

Another poster (can't remember who) had said that Andrew will re-marry Fergie once QE2 & DoE have kicked the bucket....ITA with that prediction.
Logged

Lolita
Guest

« Reply #40 on: June 10, 2012, 12:18:16 PM »

Another poster (can't remember who) had said that Andrew will re-marry Fergie once QE2 & DoE have kicked the bucket....ITA with that prediction.

They shouldn't have divorced in the first place, tbh. Neither of them has found a real relationship elsewhere.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: