Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 ... 582 583 [584] 585 586 ... 605   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Guillaume and Stephanie - NEWS  (Read 1928621 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Lizardcandy

Small Member
****

Reputation: 170

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 538





Ignore
« Reply #8745 on: May 15, 2018, 04:23:43 AM »

the little bitty lapels on her people colored coat look silly too, and the sleeves are miles too long. She's hopeless, I give up Sad
Logged
Katarinka

Baby Member
*

Reputation: 16

Offline Offline

Luxembourg Luxembourg

Posts: 51





Ignore
« Reply #8746 on: May 16, 2018, 06:59:16 AM »

Aaaand The Pants are back  Snore

It was nice while it lasted.  Star

  Old habits die hard!
Logged
Royalfan 72

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 526

Offline Offline

Germany Germany

Posts: 3571





Ignore
« Reply #8747 on: May 16, 2018, 07:09:07 AM »

Aaaand The Pants are back  Snore

Oh, there they are! Missed them.... Banana
Logged
lellobeetle

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 449

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2154



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #8748 on: May 16, 2018, 09:20:21 AM »

Poor Gui looks like he's going to blow a gasket.  Sad

Logged

Principessa

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 1211

Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 17805


I am the Queen




Ignore
« Reply #8749 on: May 16, 2018, 10:53:29 AM »

Or perhaps Guy just turned red after he had a glimpse of Stephs cleavage  Wink Smiley
Logged
Lady Alice

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1491

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 4476





Ignore
« Reply #8750 on: May 16, 2018, 03:45:21 PM »

I like Steph's natural expression in that pic... Gui can't help that redness, I can't hold it against him.
Logged

Lady Adelaide

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 872

Offline Offline

Switzerland Switzerland

Posts: 5574





Ignore
« Reply #8751 on: May 16, 2018, 05:52:10 PM »

They are in New York for the 2018 Luxembourg-American Business Award Dinner





Logged
pixiecat
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 5306

Offline Offline

Cuba Cuba

Posts: 32367


Pixiecat loves to Dish!




Ignore
« Reply #8752 on: May 16, 2018, 06:56:54 PM »

She looks good for once. Amazing how she can always pull it together when she’s abroad or with foreign dignitaries. He looks dorky as always.
Logged
lellobeetle

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 449

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2154



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #8753 on: May 17, 2018, 07:19:55 PM »

Stephanie really looks good in that gown. I sure wish she and Gui had more physical intimacy and touch like Baudouin and Fabiola. These two just don't look connected when they are in public.
Logged

Kaiserin

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 1184

Offline Offline

Germany Germany

Posts: 2834





Ignore
« Reply #8754 on: May 17, 2018, 08:34:30 PM »

So I might be in the minority here, but I don't think that she looks good when you come closer.
In the pic above, maybe, yes (the dress is a beautiful color, and although shiny, the fabric is so heavy that it does not crinkle much, as satin dresses often do and turn to look "cheap" then).

BUT, when you come closer, you see that she chose the wrong bra (seems to be some bandeau number, but without padded cups, so her breasts look strangely tube-y here, and the triangle part of the dress front looks disproportional compared to the part where the boobs are), plus the dress has kind of "modesty stich" at the lowest point of the V, which shows when she spreads her arms a bit like in this pic:



It's those little details which REALLY annoy me.

Not to speak about the Hillary Clintonesque hairdo and the awful silver open toe sandals/slingbacks - I am not sure if she's wearing the nude tights again or if we now get to see her unpainted toe nails.

She looked once really good (on her wedding day). In my eyes, seldom before and seldom after.
Logged
lellobeetle

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 449

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2154



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #8755 on: May 17, 2018, 10:01:25 PM »

Wow, what a difference between those two pictures. Kaiserin, I agree with all you've stated. The shoes are terrible. The weird low poofy hairdo. I think the lighting really helped the picture in which I thought she looked good.
Logged

Tomato

Baby Member
*

Reputation: 32

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 88





Ignore
« Reply #8756 on: May 18, 2018, 02:10:39 AM »

Looooove the rich blue color but not the style. And those pearls are just atrocious! No offense to anyone who likes pearls, I just think the necklace and earrings look cheap and like something one would get out of a gumball machine.
Logged

To-may-to, to-mah-to.
Duchess of Verona

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 467

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 1655





Ignore
« Reply #8757 on: May 18, 2018, 03:11:40 AM »

I think she looks fantastic from top to bottom. I'll take the pearls and diamonds from anyone who does not care for them.
Logged
pixiecat
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 5306

Offline Offline

Cuba Cuba

Posts: 32367


Pixiecat loves to Dish!




Ignore
« Reply #8758 on: May 18, 2018, 04:42:43 AM »

So I might be in the minority here, but I don't think that she looks good when you come closer.
In the pic above, maybe, yes (the dress is a beautiful color, and although shiny, the fabric is so heavy that it does not crinkle much, as satin dresses often do and turn to look "cheap" then).

BUT, when you come closer, you see that she chose the wrong bra (seems to be some bandeau number, but without padded cups, so her breasts look strangely tube-y here, and the triangle part of the dress front looks disproportional compared to the part where the boobs are), plus the dress has kind of "modesty stich" at the lowest point of the V, which shows when she spreads her arms a bit like in this pic:



It's those little details which REALLY annoy me.

Not to speak about the Hillary Clintonesque hairdo and the awful silver open toe sandals/slingbacks - I am not sure if she's wearing the nude tights again or if we now get to see her unpainted toe nails.

She looked once really good (on her wedding day). In my eyes, seldom before and seldom after.

And there it is. Up close, she’s a mess. Why she can’t figure out basic things like proper undergarments is simply beyond me. A better bra and shoes would have made this.

And you just know she’s got those stupid skater tights on with this.
Logged
editorathome
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 1902

Offline Offline

Bouvet Island Bouvet Island

Posts: 13932





Ignore
« Reply #8759 on: May 18, 2018, 05:19:54 AM »

I think she looks like a well-preserved socialite in her late 50's. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 582 583 [584] 585 586 ... 605   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: