Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 84   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Kate's jewelry  (Read 376979 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Harley
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 2479

Offline Offline

Yemen Yemen

Posts: 11167


Team Marie all the way




Ignore
« on: October 16, 2013, 10:05:01 AM »
I don't know if we have a thread for this already.

Do we know the origin of the orange and purple bracelet?
Logged
Lady Adelaide

Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 1202

Offline Offline

Switzerland Switzerland

Posts: 7925





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2013, 10:14:51 AM »
It's a fundraising bracelet from EACH (Each Anglia Children's Hospice).

http://www.dailymail.co.u...d-Ed-Sheerans-mother.html
Logged
Lille

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1189

Offline Offline

Posts: 6029





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2013, 10:35:32 AM »
There's another thread here  Smiley

http://royaldish.com/index.php?topic=6871.0
Logged
violetroses

Small Member
****

Reputation: 136

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 578





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2014, 12:16:34 AM »
Can somebody please tell me if Kate actually owns her diamond acorn earrings which were worn on her wedding day? There were very pretty but she has never worn them since. Does anyone think they were really Ma Midds or just a loan (free publicity for the jeweller).



On another note can't believe HM lent her a big diamond necklace  tonight just for Waity to spoil the effect by letting her hair go everywhere. Pity there arent diamond encrusted hair combs in the royal jewel box (like the ones Charlene of Monaco wore on her wedding day) it might make Waity put her hair back
Logged
“'I doubt there are any subtleties of combat I can advise you on ma'am” Ross Poldark
esther angeline

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1366

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 5307





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2014, 01:16:28 AM »
Her wedding day earrings were a gift from her parents.
Logged
SJP

Micro Member
**

Reputation: 40

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 187





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2014, 02:13:41 AM »
Strange that she never wore them again!
Logged
Fertiv
Banned
Medium Member
*****

Reputation: 278

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 993





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2014, 02:15:43 AM »
Quote from: SJP on February 12, 2014, 02:13:41 AM
Strange that she never wore them again!

Well to be fair, her hair is normally covering her ears so she could have pat butchers finest on and we'd never know..
Logged
SherbertDip

Small Member
****

Reputation: 103

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 545





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2014, 02:47:11 AM »
^
 Laugh bounce

Fertiv, it's funny because it's true!  Wink  Star
Logged
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhuOIbg-hM0
Emma Rose

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 372

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 1925





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2014, 03:19:34 AM »
Not to complain or criticize the Queen's jewels but that necklace is waaay out of date and far too formal for the event. It really looks like something one would wear to a coronation. The dress is really quite light and airy and should be worn with a smaller piece that isn't so encrusted.
Once again Kate shows the world she cannot accessorize if her life depended on it.
Logged
cordtx

Warned
Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 1438

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 9331





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2014, 03:52:25 AM »
Kate needs a Lady in Waiting, bad!
Logged
princesswende

Micro Member
**

Reputation: 45

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 181





Ignore
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2014, 01:06:09 PM »
Quote from: SJP on February 12, 2014, 02:13:41 AM
Strange that she never wore them again!

Maybe they're on display with the dress.
Logged
violetroses

Small Member
****

Reputation: 136

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 578





Ignore
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2014, 01:32:41 PM »
I don't think the dress is still being displayed. Wasnt the tiara displayed in France recently without the dress? Not sure the earrings were part of either display but I could be mistaken
Logged
“'I doubt there are any subtleties of combat I can advise you on ma'am” Ross Poldark
princesswende

Micro Member
**

Reputation: 45

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 181





Ignore
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2014, 01:41:15 PM »
Quote from: violetroses on February 13, 2014, 01:32:41 PM
I don't think the dress is still being displayed. Wasnt the tiara displayed in France recently without the dress? Not sure the earrings were part of either display but I could be mistaken

I think the wedding day combination of tiara and earrings was lovely and I'd like to see her wear them together again at some stage.
Logged
winterrose

Baby Member
*

Reputation: 18

Offline Offline

Canada Canada

Posts: 65





Ignore
« Reply #13 on: February 14, 2014, 03:16:25 AM »
Quote from: violetroses on February 13, 2014, 01:32:41 PM
I don't think the dress is still being displayed. Wasnt the tiara displayed in France recently without the dress? Not sure the earrings were part of either display but I could be mistaken

The Buckingham Palace exhibit, which was about the wedding dress, had the earrings displayed with  the dress, shoes, and tiara.   
Logged
violetroses

Small Member
****

Reputation: 136

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 578





Ignore
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2014, 11:26:53 PM »
 
Quote from: winterrose on February 14, 2014, 03:16:25 AM
Quote from: violetroses on February 13, 2014, 01:32:41 PM
I don't think the dress is still being displayed. Wasnt the tiara displayed in France recently without the dress? Not sure the earrings were part of either display but I could be mistaken

The Buckingham Palace exhibit, which was about the wedding dress, had the earrings displayed with  the dress, shoes, and tiara.   

Thnks Winterrose*champ*.
Logged
“'I doubt there are any subtleties of combat I can advise you on ma'am” Ross Poldark
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 84   Go Up
  Print  
RoyalDish.com > Abandon all hope, ye who enter here > Will, Kate, George, Charlotte and Louis > Topic: Kate's jewelry
 « previous next »
 
Jump to: