|
Kristallinchen
|
I think the thought process from child advocate groups is for neither prepubescent male or female to wear any revealing clothes. not saying I agree with that completely but that’s their statement about online pictures
So victim blaming. Hey little Susie, you shouldn’t have shown off your 4-year-old belly. Now it’s your fault that man molested you. There's this saying: Just because something isn't forbidden, doesn't necessarily mean that it is good to do it. No reason for saying we're victim blaming anyone. No one did this. Some of us are just saying that there're enough crazies out there already without beating them to it. I for my forself would never post pictures online of a my naked/half-dressed up child. Simply because I don't even want to attract those crazies. It goes of course without saying that should anything happen it would be and only be the fault of the culprit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
lothwen
Warned
|
She’s only showing her arms and shoulders. Hardly provocative, even if she were a grown woman.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
periwinkle
|
She's a cute little girl who looks like her father's sister a bit. She does not need to be tsk tsked over a 6 year old appropriate outfit. She seems to have a close relationship with her brother and that is nice. Happy birthday without your crazy granny!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Marple
|
She’s only showing her arms and shoulders. Hardly provocative, even if she were a grown woman.
She did nothing wrong of course. She is 6. It is just - she is a public figure and it could trigger the wrong kind of people. Just from a professional kind of view - they should have avoided that pic (if one of our featured girls wins a swimming cup, she will be shown on the homepage with clothes on ... ). Don't want to go down that road now, sorry, I did not want to irriate anyone with the comment, I was just very surprised about the picture in that context. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principessa
Most Exalted Member
Reputation: 2172
 Offline
 Netherlands
Posts: 33621
I am the Queen
|
Claire, Amalia and Liam promoting Young Empire: https://www.instagram.com/p/CD1ApKOKMvQ/"Family walk 🌸🌴
Claire is wearing our Jane terracotta dress 🧡
A dress in 100% soft crushed organic cotton. This is a light and comfortable long shirt style dress with side pockets, collared neckline, 3/4 sleeves and wooden button down front. The dress is soft and breathable. Embroidered verse on the sleeve:"The moment you doubt wether you can fly, you cease forever being able to do it". 🧡"  The kids seem to be fed up with it, while mommy poses happily |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Queen’s Tea
Small Member
Reputation: 220
Offline
 United States
Posts: 553
|
Holy cow! I can’t believe these kids are that big already! How’d I miss this?! Really darling kids anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gemsheal
|
Nice dress. BUT is Claire paid to wear/advertise the dress? 😕 ... drop your title & related perks then. And don't include your kids in the advertisement. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“The spirit of the artist doesn't belong to one person or another. It belongs to all of us. Don't keep its playfulness and generosity buried."
Gloria Vanderbilt - Woman to Woman
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh_Caroline
|
I believe it's their company and that they don't use their titles in conjunction with company dealings. Don't quote be on that second bit as I've done very little research. I tend to agree about the kids but I'm also mixed as it's their company.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thecrownjewelthief
|
Nice dress. BUT is Claire paid to wear/advertise the dress? 😕 ... drop your title & related perks then. And don't include your kids in the advertisement. I believe Claire and Felix co-own the company with some friends. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
onar
|
I understand their need for income and do something on their own but I agree with you guys, something's off.
I don't think it's them having the kids in the photos the only issue here. Maybe what is even more strange is that they used to be realtively unknown, def. without any interest, they don't have any kind of charisma when it comes to their public image, always out of Lux - yes, I know about MT but still... they were absent even when attending events at Lux. Suddenly, they have their own company and they play "Models Inc" with their kids. They try to push an image like those we see on blogs and on some magazines, very clean yet so "spontaneous" and close to the nature - but the pics say a different story. I don't know, I wish I could be more specific on what bothers me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
karma chamelion
|
There are stains all down the front of the dress, it looks so sloppy. I'm not impressed with these young royals fashion designs, this dress is just a cotton sack. Monaco has the same problem with wannabe designers with lots of money to burn but questionable talent.
The kids are cute, I can't believe how big they're getting. Claire and Felix have kept them hidden away so much it seems they've grown overnight. It seems wrong that they stayed hidden while they might potentially inherit but now that they're private citizens we can see them, but only so mommy can pose and merch.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord G¡n
|
I understand their need for income and do something on their own but I agree with you guys, something's off.
I don't think it's them having the kids in the photos the only issue here. Maybe what is even more strange is that they used to be realtively unknown, def. without any interest, they don't have any kind of charisma when it comes to their public image, always out of Lux - yes, I know about MT but still... they were absent even when attending events at Lux. Suddenly, they have their own company and they play "Models Inc" with their kids. They try to push an image like those we see on blogs and on some magazines, very clean yet so "spontaneous" and close to the nature - but the pics say a different story. I don't know, I wish I could be more specific on what bothers me.
So awkwardly bothersome.In my view, they are using their kids and GDF name to advertise their brand. Uh-oh!! What's wrong with this family? They are top places on the rich royals list? Claire's family is also wealthy. What's happening? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Princess MS
Warned
|
I understand their need for income and do something on their own but I agree with you guys, something's off.
I don't think it's them having the kids in the photos the only issue here. Maybe what is even more strange is that they used to be realtively unknown, def. without any interest, they don't have any kind of charisma when it comes to their public image, always out of Lux - yes, I know about MT but still... they were absent even when attending events at Lux. Suddenly, they have their own company and they play "Models Inc" with their kids. They try to push an image like those we see on blogs and on some magazines, very clean yet so "spontaneous" and close to the nature - but the pics say a different story. I don't know, I wish I could be more specific on what bothers me.
So awkwardly bothersome.In my view, they are using their kids and GDF name to advertise their brand. Uh-oh!! What's wrong with this family? They are top places on the rich royals list? Claire's family is also wealthy. What's happening? Well I'm guessing that Louis was on a "budget" and the rest as well. Clair is from a wealthy family but with Corona who knows how that affected the fathers cash flow |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lizardcandy
|
These clothes aren’t sellable, are they? I would never wear that orange sack, not even to the mailbox.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
