Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: At Events: Waity hears/sees/likes you, no she really does, promise!  (Read 148783 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Cleo12
Banned
Banned
Small Member
****

Reputation: 241

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 618





Ignore
« Reply #450 on: January 12, 2016, 02:38:31 AM »

I don't think they altered the pic. The lighting is different because the big memorial monument where the ceremony is at is probably blocking the sun. The man's faces who is waiting to hand the wreath to whoever is coming to get it behind Kate doesn't have the sun in his face or shadows showing either. And why should they make changes to that pic? It shows nothing of interest or worth such work.

According to The Telegraph, the Cambridges were not supposed to attend the ceremony.  If that's correct, then why did they?  When royals go to an event, it's always planned.  They don't do "spur of the moment" things.  So here's my jaded take on what happened:  Waitey decided to bring her whole family along to the church service as a PR stunt (witness, her family members grinning at the photographer, despite the fact that there is no reason for them to), then decided she and Wm. would attend the ceremony with the Queen.  But instead of thinking about the 58,000 dead soldiers that are being commemorated, Waitey stares right into the camera without one ounce of concern for the occasion.  Maybe that's why the other people at the ceremony are not smiling -- they are thinking about the 58,000 soldiers killed.  At least Wm. had the decency to have a serious look on his face during the ceremony; Waitey couldn't even muster that. 
Logged
MidnightDiamond

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 473

Offline Offline

Posts: 4515





Ignore
« Reply #451 on: January 12, 2016, 04:14:09 AM »

It was an easy point in the CC
Logged
CathyJane

Warned
Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 456

Offline Offline

Posts: 3721





Ignore
« Reply #452 on: January 12, 2016, 10:07:38 PM »

I don't think they altered the pic. The lighting is different because the big memorial monument where the ceremony is at is probably blocking the sun. The man's faces who is waiting to hand the wreath to whoever is coming to get it behind Kate doesn't have the sun in his face or shadows showing either. And why should they make changes to that pic? It shows nothing of interest or worth such work.

According to The Telegraph, the Cambridges were not supposed to attend the ceremony.  If that's correct, then why did they?  When royals go to an event, it's always planned.  They don't do "spur of the moment" things.  So here's my jaded take on what happened:  Waitey decided to bring her whole family along to the church service as a PR stunt (witness, her family members grinning at the photographer, despite the fact that there is no reason for them to), then decided she and Wm. would attend the ceremony with the Queen.  But instead of thinking about the 58,000 dead soldiers that are being commemorated, Waitey stares right into the camera without one ounce of concern for the occasion.  Maybe that's why the other people at the ceremony are not smiling -- they are thinking about the 58,000 soldiers killed.  At least Wm. had the decency to have a serious look on his face during the ceremony; Waitey couldn't even muster that. 


Sounds reasonable.
Logged
DebbieB

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1011

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 6044


Debbers and Bruners. (Thanks Pomme)




Ignore
« Reply #453 on: January 14, 2016, 07:11:24 PM »

I don't think they altered the pic. The lighting is different because the big memorial monument where the ceremony is at is probably blocking the sun. The man's faces who is waiting to hand the wreath to whoever is coming to get it behind Kate doesn't have the sun in his face or shadows showing either. And why should they make changes to that pic? It shows nothing of interest or worth such work.

According to The Telegraph, the Cambridges were not supposed to attend the ceremony.  If that's correct, then why did they?  When royals go to an event, it's always planned.  They don't do "spur of the moment" things.  So here's my jaded take on what happened:  Waitey decided to bring her whole family along to the church service as a PR stunt (witness, her family members grinning at the photographer, despite the fact that there is no reason for them to), then decided she and Wm. would attend the ceremony with the Queen.  But instead of thinking about the 58,000 dead soldiers that are being commemorated, Waitey stares right into the camera without one ounce of concern for the occasion.  Maybe that's why the other people at the ceremony are not smiling -- they are thinking about the 58,000 soldiers killed.  At least Wm. had the decency to have a serious look on his face during the ceremony; Waitey couldn't even muster that. 

If the telegraph is correct and the lamebridges were not due to attend then they have trawled new depths imho. Particularly as orangina was looking so smug  Ranting
Logged

"The great thing about Diana, is she always looked her bestó you never saw her slumped in the backseat of a car with legs akimbo." Tina Brown
Fingersmith

Mini Member
***

Reputation: 105

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 318


Constitutional expert




Ignore
« Reply #454 on: January 15, 2016, 02:52:22 AM »



Hahahaha not one single smile on those faces minus Waity of course.

Wow! The first time we saw Kate not look at someone while shaking their hand, I thought maybe it was unfortunate timing but it continues to happen.  ... Rude. Just rude.




I sense a new thread a-forming.
Logged
CathyJane

Warned
Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 456

Offline Offline

Posts: 3721





Ignore
« Reply #455 on: January 15, 2016, 10:10:17 PM »

She spotted a camera no doubt.
Logged
Lady Adelaide

Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 1180

Offline Offline

Switzerland Switzerland

Posts: 7815





Ignore
« Reply #456 on: February 24, 2016, 01:57:46 PM »

Logged
DuchyDiva

Large Member
******

Reputation: 526

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 1597





Ignore
« Reply #457 on: February 24, 2016, 04:57:05 PM »

Why is her belt around her chest?!!
Logged
LDJJ

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1082

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 5483





Ignore
« Reply #458 on: February 24, 2016, 05:00:10 PM »

Because she thinks she is making her torso look better by relocating her belt to a higher position.  She has a long torso and comparatively shorter legs.  So put the waistline up and wear heels to make her legs look longer than they are.  She ruined that coat with the alteration.
Logged
DuchyDiva

Large Member
******

Reputation: 526

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 1597





Ignore
« Reply #459 on: February 24, 2016, 05:19:04 PM »

Because she thinks she is making her torso look better by relocating her belt to a higher position.  She has a long torso and comparatively shorter legs.  So put the waistline up and wear heels to make her legs look longer than they are.  She ruined that coat with the alteration.

It looks bonkers!  Laughing
Logged
Suzy

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1476

Offline Offline

Posts: 3901





Ignore
« Reply #460 on: February 24, 2016, 05:23:26 PM »

Because she thinks she is making her torso look better by relocating her belt to a higher position.  She has a long torso and comparatively shorter legs.  So put the waistline up and wear heels to make her legs look longer than they are.  She ruined that coat with the alteration.

It looks bonkers!  Laughing

Or like maternity wear.  Whistle
Logged
CathyJane

Warned
Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 456

Offline Offline

Posts: 3721





Ignore
« Reply #461 on: February 24, 2016, 10:05:23 PM »

Please no!!! Angry
Logged
choux

Medium Member
*****

Reputation: 386

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 1061





Ignore
« Reply #462 on: February 24, 2016, 10:10:50 PM »



Is there a big dimple in the coat just above the pocket flap? Am on my phone but it looks like that is where the belt loop originally was.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2016, 11:17:55 PM by choux » Logged
DuchyDiva

Large Member
******

Reputation: 526

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 1597





Ignore
« Reply #463 on: February 24, 2016, 11:12:27 PM »

Because she thinks she is making her torso look better by relocating her belt to a higher position.  She has a long torso and comparatively shorter legs.  So put the waistline up and wear heels to make her legs look longer than they are.  She ruined that coat with the alteration.

It looks bonkers!  Laughing

Or like maternity wear.  Whistle

Nooooo.....  Nerves
Logged
temi

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 878

Offline Offline

Canada Canada

Posts: 2732





Ignore
« Reply #464 on: February 24, 2016, 11:46:34 PM »

Wow - Daily Mail turned off comments for this write up. I guess the fact His Royal Mattress is off her back might invite the venom from the plebes. I am suffering from Dish-fatigue with Duchess Lazy-Waity-looks a little Crazy ( I hate that word too - but unhinged doesn't rhyme) showing that she can work as hard for whatever celebrity-fringe event that interests her little pea brain between helicopter rides across the UK.

I stopped commenting on the Katie-blogs, and this will be the last time I comment on a Kate thread. This chick is exhausting in the contempt she incites in me.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: