Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Princess Margarita  (Read 4180 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Principessa

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 1440

Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 20364


I am the Queen




Ignore
« on: January 24, 2014, 02:28:57 PM »

According to Princess Margarita is the turbulent period around her first marriage to Edwin de Roy van Zuydewijn, her divorce and the breach of trust with the Royal family behind them.

The relations with the Royal family, especially with her aunt Princess Beatrix, are well again. So says the princess Friday (24-1) in an interview with the Dutch newspaper NRC Handelsblad.

"The trust had encountered a big knock. The fact that they dared to go on with me again makes me feel great, not to say moving" says Margarita.

In 2003, a family feud broke loose when the princess and her then-husband accused the Royal House of eavesdropping and thwart the career of The Roy Zuydewijn. The couple broke up in 2004 and divorced in 2006.

The eldest daughter of Princess Irene has since remarried and has two daughters. '' I have become a different person. I have not had nearly as much energy and security. Brightness too. That's why I dared to be a board member of Jumping Amsterdam. "The international horse event takes place these days off in the RAI.

Logged
Principessa

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 1440

Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 20364


I am the Queen




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2014, 02:49:42 PM »

And Edwin de Roy van Zuydewijn pops up again.

Did princess Margarita give an interview to the gossip magazine Privé late September or not? That is the point of argue between Margarita and her ex-husband Edwin de Roy van Zuydewijn. Early October Privé published a conversation with Margarita, among other things on her marriage with De Roy van Zuydewijn.

In it, she would have said among other things that she almost ended up in debt restructuring through De Roy van Zuydewijn. And that she had to pay parts of his debt. The interview irritated De Roy van Zuydewijn. By means of his laywer his asked for clarification from his ex-wive.

The Roy van Zuydewijn does not remember that she has paid its debts and wants to see proof of that.

De Roy van Zuydewijn and Margarita have been battling longer about her financial situation. After their divorce in 2006 the court ruled that Margarita had to pay De Roy van Zuydewijn a monthly alimony of 5.500 euros. The court later decided that she didn't need to pay because she hasn't have sufficient 'financial' resources. De Roy van Zuydewijn tries to reopen the alimony as. According to him, his ex-wife had sufficient funds to pay him.

The lawyer of Margarita informed by letter that De Roy van Zuydewijn has no right on the information from his ex-wife. Morever according to the lawyer Margarita had not give an interview to Privé.  She also threatenes that Margarita will file a disciplinary complaint against the lawyer of De Roy van Zuydewijn because of "improper pressure" in the sent letter.

Margarita's lawyer does not want to give explanation about the content of the letter. She reiterates that "no interview" took place, but would not say whether Margarita has spoken with someone from Privé.

The Roy Zuydewijn has been conducting a struggle against the Dutch royal family because he would be thwarted and blackened systematically by them. Also prince Bernhard (Margarita's grandfather) induced investigation of De Roy van Zuydewijn by security agencies.

The magazine Privé announced that they indeed have spoken to Margarita.
Logged
pixiecat
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 5448

Offline Offline

Cuba Cuba

Posts: 33095


Pixiecat loves to Dish!




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2014, 09:37:21 PM »

Who is this guy?  I know that they were married, but is he noble?  What does he do for a living?  How long were they married?  Do they have any kids?  Why did they divorce? 

He sounds shady as hell.
Logged
Principessa

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 1440

Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 20364


I am the Queen




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2014, 02:46:05 PM »

Who is this guy?  I know that they were married, but is he noble?  What does he do for a living?  How long were they married?  Do they have any kids?  Why did they divorce? 

He sounds shady as hell.

According to his Wikipedia:

De Roy van Zuydewijn, a member of the family De Roy, was born on the Keizersgracht in Amsterdam. The fifth child and first son of laywer Leo de Roy van Zuydewijn and Wijnande Eleonore van gulden. His father is from a non-aristocratic branch of the Dutch patrician family De Roy van Zuydewijn. His parents divorced two years after his birth; his father died when De Roy van Zuydewijn was twelve years old.

De Roy van Zuydewijn went to the Amsterdam Lyceum and the boarding school Louisa State in Baarn. The latest was apperently originally founded by Freemansonry. Subsequently De Roy van Zuydewijn studied at Leiden Webster University in Leiden, Netherlands. He continued at the University of California - Los Angeles. Earlier he had also spend some time at the University of Amsterdam and was a member the fraternity Sirius of the Amsterdam Student Corps.In 1997 he obtained a PhD at Oriel College, an educational institution that is part of Oxford University, with a thesis on political aspects of arms supplies from the Federal Republic of Germany to the Middle East.

In 1998 he was appointed as a Director Benelux for the London-based company Eligo Public Relations International.

Also in 1998 De Roy van Zuydewijn met princess Margarita. The civil marriage of the couple was on June 19, 2001 in Amsterdam The civil wedding was in September of the same year in Auch (France) by Msgr. Philippe Bar, Bishop emeritus of Rotterdam.

On May 28, 2001 De Roy van Zuydewijn took over the investment firm Leba BV of Van Lanschot Bankiers, and baptized the company to Fincentives. A company that developed financial software. Fincentives, located in Amsterdam, was not a succes. With support of his then wife De Roy van Zuydewijn in 2003 accused the Dutch Royal Family of having overheard him and have thwarted his buiness. The case escalated when the couple in March 2004 explained in the magazine HP/De Tijd what they  (royal family) apparently did to them. In the same year it became known that the former director of the Queens kabinet Felix Rhodius had given the General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) the command to examine De Roy van Zuydewijn. This was admitted by then Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende. 

A law firm assisted De Roy van Zuydewijn in his case against the Dutch government. The contact between De Roy van Zuydewijn en his laywers didn't went smoothly and on June 24, 2003 laywers Peter Nicolai and Jurjen Pen announced they no longer represent De Roy van Zuydewjn. A short time later also Margarita broke with the legal team. The couple was then briefly assisted by Britta Bohler and Victor Koppe. On August 13,2004 Margarita's attorney Germ Kemper announced that she and De Roy van Zuydewijn Roy van Zuydewijn got divorced, this against the wishes of the Roy Zuydewijn. Earlier that day, it was announced that personal papers of Margarita had been stolen from her car; it is suspected that this included her divorce papers.

On November 8, 2006 the divorce was formally pronounced. On the same day the mother of Edwin de Roy van Zuydewijn, Eleonore van Gulden, gave an extensive interview with the television news programm EénVandaag.

In the television show Barend en van Dorp on March 11, 2005 De Roy van Zuydewijn stated that he had received a letter in which he was informed that the divorce preceedings were stopped. A day later, the laywer of Margarita announced hat the procedure was postponed, but that the divorce went through. Furthermore De Roy van Zuydewijn is negatively on the role of prince Bernhard (Margarita's grandfather) in the case,  according to him because of the fear about a client of his father, which Bernhard felt threatened. He also showed incriminating documents show that had to prove that Bernhard was"wrong" during the war.

On September 8, 2006 the magazine Propria Cures published a piece written by De Roy van Zuydewijn. In it, he asserts that the Greet Hofmans affair was a diversion of Prince Bernhard. That would have put the affair to avoid a scandal would erupt on letters which he wrote to Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler (including the steward Letter) in 1942. Two of them were co-signed by his wife, Queen Juliana. The piece of Roy Zuydewijn calls Prince Bernhard "our biggest traitor ever."

According to his attorney Gabriel Meijers police wanted to question De Roy van Zuydewijn about a complaint against him for breaking of official secrecy in relation to illegal disclosure of documents. In the news programm De Roy van Zuydewijn says he finds it very odd, because he has never held office within the kingdom.On September 9 2006 the AIVD announced that they and the Dutch state hadn't made the complaint. According to Advocatie.nl the declaration was made by Margarita. And in 2011, the OM and Margarita backed down De Roy van Zuydewijn was vindicated and his lawyer was awarded a compensation of € 12.000, -.

On December 12, 2012 De Roy van Zuydewijn had to go to court in case of fraud amount of 238.000 guilders on fraud at Het Bouwfonds. On August 13, 2013 he was awarded in absentia a sentence of 100 hours. In higher appeal of De Roy van Zuydewijn he was acquitted at all because of a total lack of evidence.
 
On April 1, 2009, the National Ombudsman announced to launch an investigation into possible abuse of power and unlawful interference with the private life of De Roy van Zuydewijn by the Queen and the Ministry of General Affairs. De Roy van Zuydewijn said his business, social and marital life was destroyed and that this was due to effects from the government. The Ombudsman said he had to take the complaint because of sufficient points De Roy van Zuydewijn said in EénVandaag he could find no work because his name was tarnished and he was thwarted by the government since 2002 He would have lived from donations since then.

Logged
Principessa

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 1440

Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 20364


I am the Queen




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2014, 02:59:31 PM »

Continue

On January 13, 2010, the Ombudsman announced the results of his research. According to the Ombudsman, there are no indications that the government has interfered with the private life of De Roy van Zuydewijn. The suspicions of this intervention are not supported by documents or sworn testimony, says Ombudsman Brenninkmeijer. The complaint of Roy was decleared as 'unfounded' declared.

In another case, the National Ombudsman took it out for De Roy van Zuydewijn. In April 2013 it was announced that the Amsterdam public prosecutor has refused to dismiss a case against De Roy van Zuydewijn despite a court ruling. The National Ombudsman therefore addressed the Board of Procurators General. Subsequently the case officer immediately took action and apologized. Prince Carlos, the current Duke of Parma, accused De Roy van Zuydewijn to bring so called insect stories of him and his sister Margarita in public.  The declaration was made in 2007, in July 2011 De Roy van Zuydewijn was informed and in February 2012 the case was dropped. Later a compensation of around € 16,000, -. was awarded.

On April 15, 2013  a disciplinary complaint against the deken Germ Kemper is filed by De Roy van Zuydewijn, upheld in part. Kemper had an interview with gossip magazine Story on the state of the judiciary and legal profession in the Netherlands. The reason was partly the lawsuit between De Roy van Zuydewijn and his ex-wife Princess Margarita whether she should pay him alimony. In the piece Kemper spoke as deken on the matter and said that he "by coincidence" knew somethings about the maintenance issue and that there was "a huge misunderstanding on the part of the laywer of the complainant".  In the article, however, it was nt clear that Kemper besides deken als has been a laywer of Margarita. According to De Roy van Zuydewijn Kemper had (partly) abused is function as deken to contribute to a negative image of him in the media. The Court of Discipline among others found it "inappropriate" that Kemper as deken talked over a case in which his client Margarita was involved.
Logged
pixiecat
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 5448

Offline Offline

Cuba Cuba

Posts: 33095


Pixiecat loves to Dish!




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2014, 08:57:10 PM »

He sounds like he's paranoid.  He also sounds like a slime ball who will do anything to scam people.
Logged
Principessa

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 1440

Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 20364


I am the Queen




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2014, 08:59:12 PM »

He sounds like he's paranoid.  He also sounds like a slime ball who will do anything to scam people.

The same feeling over here
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: