The Crown series continues to puzzle me. I know the producers' agenda is to depict the BRF unflatteringly. But even this, is surely no reason at all for depicting Philip as partially responsible for his sister Cecilia's being on the plane that crashed. Or for the scene of Prince Andrew of Greece chewing Philip out afterward. Those scenes totally disgusted me.
The prevailing fiction(s) that the producers keep coming up with are actually much less interesting than the truth (or at least, as much of the "truth" as any reader of Royal bio's or letters can know).
For example I thought they dropped the ball on
a juicy and dramatic, plot line when they ignored the Duke & Duchess of Windsor appearing at the memorial unveiling at Marlborough House in 1967. It was the first, and only, public appearance by the couple at a Royal event. The Duchess of Windsor omitted a curtsey to the Queen Mother. The Queen Mother, and more importantly the Queen, noticed this. The couple (I think?) were not mentioned as being present in the Court Circular, but there were some cheers from the public. Imagine the acting that Olivia Coleman, Derek Jacobi and Geraldine Chaplin could have done with this!