KimmySue
Small Member
Reputation: 163
 Offline
 United States
Posts: 584
|
Mary is disgusting with those "charity" gifts to her family imo. I too gave clothes that no longer fit to relatives but with Mosh I get the impression she gives them her leftovers as to show how big she got  The difference is you paid for yours, the Danish taxpayers paid for Mary's. That is why I find it so horrible that she resells some of her clothes. I think if she is going to give her clothes away, do it to a real charity (not her family). Here we have charities that take business/designer clothes and give them to people for job interviews, business attire, things like that. She could actually help people with her unwanted clothes, but then again, she would have to actually care about people other than herself to do something like that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
imqrious
Micro Member
Reputation: 31
Offline
Posts: 126
|
Mary is disgusting with those "charity" gifts to her family imo. I too gave clothes that no longer fit to relatives but with Mosh I get the impression she gives them her leftovers as to show how big she got The difference is you paid for yours, the Danish taxpayers paid for Mary's. That is why I find it so horrible that she resells some of her clothes. I think if she is going to give her clothes away, do it to a real charity (not her family). Here we have charities that take business/designer clothes and give them to people for job interviews, business attire, things like that. She could actually help people with her unwanted clothes, but then again, she would have to actually care about people other than herself to do something like that. I totally agree with you! Technically, wouldn't the clothes belong to "the people" as they paid for them! What better way to "recycle" then to give it to one of the charities that help clothe people trying to get back on their feet. OR let the charities sell them for the funds to funnel back into the charities. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PeDe
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 31, 2017, 12:36:26 AM by PeDe »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Princess BlueEyes
Warned
|
^^^
I sure hope she bought that Melissa Odabash suit for the sale price because the original price of $242.00 is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pixiecat
|
Why TF does she need two wetsuit tops for one vacation? I don't like any of the things she's been pictured in. That skirt is awful, especially with the top, and the bathing suits are awful on her. If I see her nipples one more time, I'm going to puke. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chocolate_angel
|
me, too, pixiecat!  I don't want to see her private parts...but then we all can see what Fred saw in her when he met her at a bar. THe one night stand that wouldn'T go away....  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elbejay
Baby Member
Reputation: 5
Offline
 United Kingdom
Posts: 10
|
This is my new favourite thread.
I still don’t understand why she needed 2 new wetsuit tops for playing in the warm surf. And while not identical, they are very close. Odd!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pixiecat
|
This is my new favourite thread.
I still don’t understand why she needed 2 new wetsuit tops for playing in the warm surf. And while not identical, they are very close. Odd!
Welcome!  I know, right? People who are serious surfers and beach swimmers don't take two new wetsuit tops with them for their beach getaways. Just more money wasted on unnecessary things purely for the benefit of the cameras. Madame is greedy. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
perdie
|
This is my new favourite thread.
I still don’t understand why she needed 2 new wetsuit tops for playing in the warm surf. And while not identical, they are very close. Odd!
So that her audience would know that these were different occasions, of course! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PeDe
|
 final total for 2015 = $68,919.11 (conservatively)final total for 2016 = $76,549.28 (conservatively)final total for 2017 = $85,557.56 (conservatively) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
fairy
Most Exalted Member
Reputation: 3750
Offline
Posts: 18181
|
So nothing to worry, really, even with the increase of slightly under 10.000$ a year we will not hit the six digits this coming year... What an economic buyer she is...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mary's life motto: "if I had the choice between world peace and a Prada handbag, I'd choose the latter one" Marian Keyes.  |
|
|
|
|
|
chocolate_angel
|
Maybe Mosh spends more money on clothes each year because in their post-nup it says that Fred has to pay her standard-living, thus if she spends approx. 90 000 USD on clothes each year she can argue it's her standard and in the end Fred has to pay her that (besides alimony?)...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PeDe
|
So nothing to worry, really, even with the increase of slightly under 10.000$ a year we will not hit the six digits this coming year... What an economic buyer she is...
it would be over a 100,000.00 for 2017. There are at least 10 items we could not identify, designer dresses and jewelry. When I looked up what similar items from those designers cost, her total upt to 103,763.83 Since we didn't have the actual prices of those items, I just added up what was established. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elbejay
Baby Member
Reputation: 5
Offline
United Kingdom
Posts: 10
|
Mosh is more greedy every year.
Am I allowed to post outfits and prices as I find them in the 2018 thread?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
