For me the worst choice of a woman for princess of a country was Slitzerella of Sweden. Unsuitable in every way.
ITA. And it is so wrong on so many levels: Her past, her behaviour, the approval of ther inlaws (who snubbed Daniel on the other hand for so long and had no idea what nationality Chris was) ... Also the promotion of her and CP, at times they do more work and have more newspaper coverage than Victoria and Dan and the kids.
I can't read Swedish papers. Is it that bad for Madde? She's chosen to live outside her country but she seems to lead a happy family life. Also, her husband was decent enough to reject titles and so have more freedom. Neither is doing dirty business in her country,are they? I don't understand the bad press, but it tends to be the same everywhere.Are part of her expenses funded by the taxpayer?
AFAIK Chris's business is clean and as for their expenses...IIRK all of their regular expenses are covered from Chris's income and their investment portfolios (a few years ago it was revealed that Maddie has the largest portfolio of the three kids)...IIRK Maddie does receive an allowance for duties performed.
This year she has only preformed two engagements (both on February 7th)...attending the Executive Committee Meeting World Childhood Foundation and then the charity dinner on the occasion of the World Childhood Foundation's 20th anniversary. Last year she had 10 engagements recorded on the official calendar.
https://www.kungahuset.se...68101a4e888378000228.htmlWith so few engagements any allowance is likely very small and probably only covers clothing, travel, and the like. She really only does stuff for Childhood and then general family events (National Day, Victoria Day, Nobel stuff, etc.).