Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Kate has a boy!  (Read 54301 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Diamond Lil

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 995

Offline Offline

New Zealand New Zealand

Posts: 3949



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #315 on: April 27, 2018, 04:41:25 AM »

I've always had the impression (rightly or wrongly) that William uses access to his children to punish his father.  His mother isn't here to enjoy them, so why should his father?
Logged

Princess BlueEyes

Warned
Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 748

Offline Offline

Posts: 3846





Ignore
« Reply #316 on: April 27, 2018, 04:53:32 AM »

Maybe they are like some others who have more than one name and are taking a few days to decide which one feels "right".

I thinking the DM is just stirring the pot by blaming Charles. I am tired of people causing trouble especially when it shadows a joyous event.

I haven't seen any reports of Grandpa Middleton visiting, either.  Did I miss it? 
Logged

    
luvcharles

Warned
Big Member
*******

Reputation: 787

Online Online

Australia Australia

Posts: 2199





Ignore
« Reply #317 on: April 27, 2018, 05:00:52 AM »

Charles offered to cancel engagements to be available to see George but was told by William 'don't bother'.


Where did you read this, if you don't me asking?

This is the most recent article with this claim but I have read it many times since George's birth in many media outlets.
http://www.dailymail.co.u...hy-Charles-seen-baby.html

It is in the Richard Kay section - which itself speaks volumes about its veracity as he is being sympathetic to Charles and Kay is rarely sympathetic to Charles having tied himself so solidly to Diana's side in the war of the Wales' that he was described as Diana's pet reporter.
Logged
Margaret

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1199

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 3525





Ignore
« Reply #318 on: April 27, 2018, 06:03:59 AM »

Charles offered to cancel engagements to be available to see George but was told by William 'don't bother'.


Where did you read this, if you don't me asking?

This is the most recent article with this claim but I have read it many times since George's birth in many media outlets.
http://www.dailymail.co.u...hy-Charles-seen-baby.html

It is in the Richard Kay section - which itself speaks volumes about its veracity as he is being sympathetic to Charles and Kay is rarely sympathetic to Charles having tied himself so solidly to Diana's side in the war of the Wales' that he was described as Diana's pet reporter.


Goodness!  If Richard Kay, of all people, is associated with an article that is sympathetic to Charles, I believe it without doubt.
Logged
fairy

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 3664

Offline Offline

Posts: 17971





Ignore
« Reply #319 on: April 27, 2018, 09:37:33 AM »

Don't really care about any of the brouhaha  behind the naming, but I sincerely hope for the little one not be called Bertie. Honestly is that what Britain considers a strong name?
Bertie as in Ernie and Bert?
I mean we don't need Rambo or Thor, but there must be something more masculine than Bertie?
(Fo everyone of my generation who has watched and enjoyed "when Harry met Sally": do you remember Harry's take on men's names? How a woman needs to be able to call the name in the throws of passion, without it sounding silly? "Yes, Bertie, give it to me..Bertie" ---Wouldn't work for me... Halo)
Logged

Mary's life motto:
"if I had the choice between world peace and a Prada handbag, I'd choose the latter one" Marian Keyes.
rosella
Banned
Banned
Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 840

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 3339





Ignore
« Reply #320 on: April 27, 2018, 10:19:20 AM »

In one of Charles's bios there's a story that Tiggy (William and Harry's childhood 'big sister') phoned Charles up with some friendly advice after he spent George's first birthday inspecting a red squirrel sanctuary in another county. She begged him to start building a relationship with his first grandchild which meant scheduling some regular time for him throughout the year. If this happened with the first grandchild then it appears nothing's changed subsequently with the other two.
Logged
Little_star
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 3016

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 29589



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #321 on: April 27, 2018, 11:03:53 AM »

I've always had the impression (rightly or wrongly) that William uses access to his children to punish his father.  His mother isn't here to enjoy them, so why should his father?

I agree. His relationship with Charles seems troubled.
Logged

(img)http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f334/Little_stars/2017-03-07%2023.04.19.png(/img)
A Citizen not a Subject

Warned
Medium Member
*****

Reputation: 398

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 959





Ignore
« Reply #322 on: April 27, 2018, 11:11:23 AM »

I genuinely think they’re still deciding. Put it this way, if they have chosen a name, surely it would be much harder to keep it a secret this time around, with George at school? You can hardly make a four year old keep such a secret, and all it would take would be one mention in the classroom to one of his 20 classmates, and surely it would leak? Perhaps the press should be monitoring the activity around bookmakers in Battersea?

As for Charles’s access/relationship with his grandchildren; it’s interesting to compare this to the recent brouhaha in Spain, where Sofia’s alleged complaints are the same; that the maternal family has more access whereas she has to effectively make an appointment. If it’s Letizia’s perrogative as a parent to organise her children’s routine, surely it is also William’s?
Logged

I live in hope that one day I will be able to elect my Head of State.
Clara
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 2508

Offline Offline

Spain Spain

Posts: 12164





Ignore
« Reply #323 on: April 27, 2018, 11:16:01 AM »

I genuinely think they’re still deciding. Put it this way, if they have chosen a name, surely it would be much harder to keep it a secret this time around, with George at school? You can hardly make a four year old keep such a secret, and all it would take would be one mention in the classroom to one of his 20 classmates, and surely it would leak? Perhaps the press should be monitoring the activity around bookmakers in Battersea?

As for Charles’s access/relationship with his grandchildren; it’s interesting to compare this to the recent brouhaha in Spain, where Sofia’s alleged complaints are the same; that the maternal family has more access whereas she has to effectively make an appointment. If it’s Letizia’s perrogative as a parent to organise her children’s routine, surely it is also William’s?


Fascinating how you compare the male royal born and the actual son of Charles with the female consort in-law  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Logged

A Citizen not a Subject

Warned
Medium Member
*****

Reputation: 398

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 959





Ignore
« Reply #324 on: April 27, 2018, 11:25:13 AM »

I genuinely think they’re still deciding. Put it this way, if they have chosen a name, surely it would be much harder to keep it a secret this time around, with George at school? You can hardly make a four year old keep such a secret, and all it would take would be one mention in the classroom to one of his 20 classmates, and surely it would leak? Perhaps the press should be monitoring the activity around bookmakers in Battersea?

As for Charles’s access/relationship with his grandchildren; it’s interesting to compare this to the recent brouhaha in Spain, where Sofia’s alleged complaints are the same; that the maternal family has more access whereas she has to effectively make an appointment. If it’s Letizia’s perrogative as a parent to organise her children’s routine, surely it is also William’s?


Fascinating how you compare the male royal born and the actual son of Charles with the female consort in-law  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
I was comparing the person getting the “blame”, rightly or wrongly, for the supposedly poor relationships. If I were Letizia, I’d be pissed off that no one in the press or elsewhere seems to question Felipe on this matter; they’re his daughters too.
Logged

I live in hope that one day I will be able to elect my Head of State.
casie

Micro Member
**

Reputation: 58

Offline Offline

Posts: 167





Ignore
« Reply #325 on: April 27, 2018, 11:27:38 AM »

delete
Logged
Ellie

Warned
Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1447

Online Online

United States United States

Posts: 5390


wannabe Lesbaru driver




Ignore
« Reply #326 on: April 27, 2018, 11:37:34 AM »

I genuinely think they’re still deciding. Put it this way, if they have chosen a name, surely it would be much harder to keep it a secret this time around, with George at school? You can hardly make a four year old keep such a secret, and all it would take would be one mention in the classroom to one of his 20 classmates, and surely it would leak? Perhaps the press should be monitoring the activity around bookmakers in Battersea?

As for Charles’s access/relationship with his grandchildren; it’s interesting to compare this to the recent brouhaha in Spain, where Sofia’s alleged complaints are the same; that the maternal family has more access whereas she has to effectively make an appointment. If it’s Letizia’s perrogative as a parent to organise her children’s routine, surely it is also William’s?

If you ask me it has a lot to  do with the situation. We know how William behaves. We also know Charles is busy. We know Letizia most likely, nor would Felipe I imagine, do such things out of spite. William absolutely would. It's a different situation entirely imo.
Logged

writing angry fauxminist letters in the Lesbaru
Little_star
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 3016

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 29589



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #327 on: April 27, 2018, 11:39:57 AM »

I genuinely think they’re still deciding. Put it this way, if they have chosen a name, surely it would be much harder to keep it a secret this time around, with George at school? You can hardly make a four year old keep such a secret, and all it would take would be one mention in the classroom to one of his 20 classmates, and surely it would leak? Perhaps the press should be monitoring the activity around bookmakers in Battersea?

As for Charles’s access/relationship with his grandchildren; it’s interesting to compare this to the recent brouhaha in Spain, where Sofia’s alleged complaints are the same; that the maternal family has more access whereas she has to effectively make an appointment. If it’s Letizia’s perrogative as a parent to organise her children’s routine, surely it is also William’s?


Fascinating how you compare the male royal born and the actual son of Charles with the female consort in-law  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


 Star
Logged

(img)http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f334/Little_stars/2017-03-07%2023.04.19.png(/img)
danifaul

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 424

Offline Offline

Posts: 2188


sorry for my bad english




Ignore
« Reply #328 on: April 27, 2018, 06:23:21 PM »

about Louis  Smiley  sound british or french

 Diana and Charles...... they were also criticized  Thinking  Henry's choice name , instead of Harry?
Logged

Amina

Small Member
****

Reputation: 78

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 623





Ignore
« Reply #329 on: April 27, 2018, 06:53:25 PM »

I just wanted to say congratulations to her.  Louis is a lovely name. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: