Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Godparents to Baby Sussex  (Read 63967 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
BassChick

Baby Member
*

Reputation: 17

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 78





Ignore
« Reply #525 on: July 10, 2019, 08:01:32 AM »

So Charlie van Straubenzee, Izzy May (Soho House publicist), Tiggy Legge Bourke, Markus Anderson and the two US college friends, then?

I think that is a good prediction. Links to the past with Charlie, Tiggy and the college friends along with two more recent ones.

I'd also wonder about a lesser known Spencer cousin... the Aunts were there ... one of their children

They were laying on the Spencer connection so thickly I wouldn't be surprised if it was both aunts, Kitty Spencer, Viscount Spencer, Abigail Spencer, Frank Spencer, Spencer Matthews, the current chief Executive of Marks and Spencer and all three members of the John Spencer Blues Explosion.



 Star Laughing
Logged
lisadug

Warned
Small Member
****

Reputation: 215

Offline Offline

Posts: 636





Ignore
« Reply #526 on: July 12, 2019, 10:49:09 AM »

How much more bad news about her character is out there? And how much more has the Palace managed to neutralise?

As much as they can drag up or make up, itís never ending and impossible to tell truth from fiction, she goes from saint to sinner and back again on an hourly basis.  Itís all kind of tedious now.
Logged
Future Crayon

Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 2242

Online Online

Posts: 9398


Sophie Winklestan




Ignore
« Reply #527 on: July 12, 2019, 11:08:58 AM »

How much more bad news about her character is out there? And how much more has the Palace managed to neutralise?

As much as they can drag up or make up, itís never ending and impossible to tell truth from fiction, she goes from saint to sinner and back again on an hourly basis.  Itís all kind of tedious now.

It is quite exhausting. And, a bit off topic, maybe royal reporters could write one less Meg piece a day and maybe look a bit closer at Andy, who is currently far more newsworthy, if you ask me.
Logged

Kate kills trees, pass it on
Margaret

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1170

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 3467





Ignore
« Reply #528 on: July 13, 2019, 04:16:41 AM »

Deleted.  Totally o/t.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2019, 04:23:00 AM by Margaret » Logged
PruNordstrom

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 971

Offline Offline

Posts: 4069





Ignore
« Reply #529 on: July 21, 2019, 05:47:15 AM »

Maria, do you think it's time to close this topic? Thre really is nothing more to be said about it. IMHO.
Logged

The only thing most people do better than anyone else is read their own handwriting.
Hester
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 2195

Offline Offline

Samoa Samoa

Posts: 12022





Ignore
« Reply #530 on: July 21, 2019, 09:44:27 AM »

Maria, do you think it's time to close this topic? Thre really is nothing more to be said about it. IMHO.

Just don't follow it if you don't want further posts here. Threads lapse after a while anyway.
Logged
cordtx

Warned
Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 1320

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 8826





Ignore
« Reply #531 on: July 21, 2019, 10:05:12 AM »

Maybe will find out who the ďmysteryĒgodparents were at soma point
Logged
Eliza B

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 709

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2468





Ignore
« Reply #532 on: July 21, 2019, 01:01:20 PM »

How much more bad news about her character is out there? And how much more has the Palace managed to neutralise?

As much as they can drag up or make up, itís never ending and impossible to tell truth from fiction, she goes from saint to sinner and back again on an hourly basis.  Itís all kind of tedious now.

Sara learned from her run against Trump,  flooding the market with ridiculous stories buries the truth. There's so much out there, no one knows what's what.

As for God parents,  well,  I doubt anyone cares.  They should not have released a press statement to drum up interest.  But I don't think anyone cares at this point and wants a break from the Sussex daily drama.
Logged
Oh_Caroline

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 564

Offline Offline

Posts: 2378





Ignore
« Reply #533 on: July 21, 2019, 01:54:16 PM »

The upset was less about not knowing who the godparents are (because really no one cares) and much, much more about withholding harmless information yet again.  With the Cambridge kids there were a few articles in the week after with short bios but that was it.

All the Stans are like "the don't want the doctors/godparents hounded" and RR are like "that's never happened and the one person you use to backup you claim (poor Jacintha) wasn't hounded but was part of a prank by an Aussie radio show...keep us Brits out of it".  Heck if you rewatch the videos from the arrivals and departures for George & Louis's christenings the press are silent (other than the clicking of cameras)...so yeah no hounding. Hard to tell over the crowd at Charlotte's.

The RR don't like being blamed for things they had no part in, really don't like when American outlets are favored over British ones, and really, really don't like how everything the Sussexes are pulling* is keeping British RR from doing their jobs.

*Archie's Birth, Archie's Christening, kicking reporters out of events, keeping RRs physically further away at events, etc.
Logged
Duchess of Verona

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 595

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2016





Ignore
« Reply #534 on: July 21, 2019, 05:46:25 PM »

I still cant get over "Archie Harrison". Just dreadful.
Logged
Margaret

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1170

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 3467





Ignore
« Reply #535 on: July 22, 2019, 12:49:16 AM »

I still cant get over "Archie Harrison". Just dreadful.

I feel the same.  My dislike of the name has not lessened with time and I doubt it will.   

Logged
Gate Keeper

Baby Member
*

Reputation: 1

Offline Offline

Brazil Brazil

Posts: 5





Ignore
« Reply #536 on: July 26, 2019, 03:54:05 AM »

Looks as though there's an "arrangement" with Chris Allerton Photography - or the company wouldn't be named on the announcement.  Have there been ANY previous royal occasion announcements that included a promo for a photography business like that?

Has Harry forgotten how to behave?


He has forgotten many things, hole in his shoe, the unmatched socks with the shoes...is going down hill
Logged
jolene

Small Member
****

Reputation: 129

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 601





Ignore
« Reply #537 on: July 26, 2019, 03:57:07 AM »

As others have said, the name Archie is tragic. He'll legally change it once he's 18. When we had our daughter, we wanted a classic name. We didn't want her to later hate us when she's in school or sending her resume.
Logged
SvenskaSarah

Small Member
****

Reputation: 143

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 569





Ignore
« Reply #538 on: July 27, 2019, 08:28:54 PM »

The upset was less about not knowing who the godparents are (because really no one cares) and much, much more about withholding harmless information yet again.  With the Cambridge kids there were a few articles in the week after with short bios but that was it.

All the Stans are like "the don't want the doctors/godparents hounded" and RR are like "that's never happened and the one person you use to backup you claim (poor Jacintha) wasn't hounded but was part of a prank by an Aussie radio show...keep us Brits out of it".  Heck if you rewatch the videos from the arrivals and departures for George & Louis's christenings the press are silent (other than the clicking of cameras)...so yeah no hounding. Hard to tell over the crowd at Charlotte's.

The RR don't like being blamed for things they had no part in, really don't like when American outlets are favored over British ones, and really, really don't like how everything the Sussexes are pulling* is keeping British RR from doing their jobs.

*Archie's Birth, Archie's Christening, kicking reporters out of events, keeping RRs physically further away at events, etc.

I think a lot of the animosity too has caused by how public they were. If they wanted a completely private lifestyle, why the huge wedding that cost the taxpayers millions, during which homeless people were moved on to make Windsor and the streets "look nice"? Why did Harry keep his title, and gain a dukedom? Why carry out engagements on behalf of the Royal family if you want a private lifestyle? They are no better than the average benefit cheats we have in Britain, who want all the money and niceties without having to work/pay for it.
As Marie Antoinette learned to her horror, you cannot have your cake and eat it, because revolution will happen!
Logged
Eliza B

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 709

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2468





Ignore
« Reply #539 on: July 27, 2019, 08:35:42 PM »

The upset was less about not knowing who the godparents are (because really no one cares) and much, much more about withholding harmless information yet again.  With the Cambridge kids there were a few articles in the week after with short bios but that was it.

All the Stans are like "the don't want the doctors/godparents hounded" and RR are like "that's never happened and the one person you use to backup you claim (poor Jacintha) wasn't hounded but was part of a prank by an Aussie radio show...keep us Brits out of it".  Heck if you rewatch the videos from the arrivals and departures for George & Louis's christenings the press are silent (other than the clicking of cameras)...so yeah no hounding. Hard to tell over the crowd at Charlotte's.

The RR don't like being blamed for things they had no part in, really don't like when American outlets are favored over British ones, and really, really don't like how everything the Sussexes are pulling* is keeping British RR from doing their jobs.

*Archie's Birth, Archie's Christening, kicking reporters out of events, keeping RRs physically further away at events, etc.

I think a lot of the animosity too has caused by how public they were. If they wanted a completely private lifestyle, why the huge wedding that cost the taxpayers millions, during which homeless people were moved on to make Windsor and the streets "look nice"? Why did Harry keep his title, and gain a dukedom? Why carry out engagements on behalf of the Royal family if you want a private lifestyle? They are no better than the average benefit cheats we have in Britain, who want all the money and niceties without having to work/pay for it.
As Marie Antoinette learned to her horror, you cannot have your cake and eat it, because revolution will happen!

Exactly! One can argue they're public,  but he's  private, but they released a press statement saying the date,  church,  and priest but NO godparents for privacy.  Why not just you know have a private affair and don't release a statement.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: