Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 37   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Godparents to Baby Sussex  (Read 117915 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kpzra

Small Member
****

Reputation: 159

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 551





Ignore
« Reply #465 on: July 07, 2019, 06:58:10 PM »

If Kate is wearing the earrings worn by Diana at Harryís own christening, MM would be fuming. It also would confirm that Kate is no shrinking violet. She dislikes MM as much as the majority of Brits do and is not above playing a few headgames with the Pushy Princess. Go Kate!

Mette-Marit is the only MM here. Wink
Logged
Snow Queen

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1395

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 6557





Ignore
« Reply #466 on: July 07, 2019, 08:30:45 PM »

About the missing Cambridge Trio - I donít think Meghan wanted them there and I donít think their parents wanted to subject them to this toxic mess. Win-Win for both sides.
Logged
NAOTMAA

Medium Member
*****

Reputation: 333

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 816





Ignore
« Reply #467 on: July 07, 2019, 08:54:32 PM »

If people really think Kate wore Diana's earrings to spite Meghan then they don't know Kate all.

Kate only does that type of thing to other women she perceives as a threat to her territory. To something she either has or wants. Her way of saying "Mine! Mine! Stay away!" She only that type of thing when it comes to William. Certainly not for public/press attention cause she could care less about either of those.

So unless she really does perceive Meghan as a personal threat (I doubt it) she probably just thought christening for Diana's grandson equals let's wear Diana's earrings yay isn't that cute.  
Logged
Future Crayon

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 3726

Offline Offline

Posts: 13349


Til and Phil fan account




Ignore
« Reply #468 on: July 07, 2019, 09:15:13 PM »

So unless she really does perceive Meghan as a personal threat (I doubt it) she probably just thought christening for Diana's grandson equals let's wear Diana's earrings yay isn't that cute.  


I agree, iI think it's one of those nice/overthought nods to the past which Kate seems to like.
Logged

Cool your jets, everyone
Evangelina

Warned
Baby Member
*

Reputation: 22

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 95





Ignore
« Reply #469 on: July 07, 2019, 09:29:44 PM »

The joys of photoshop's liquify tools, Markle lost 10 kg of weight since Friday, and baby magicaly became more ''caucasian'' looking, just like his mum declared on her modeling page .
Harry's left shoulder is moved towards Markle, and has a massive ''burn'' error to hide the movement. Markles shoulder where the merge happend has a ''dodge'' error.
Whoever the poor person that had to do the photos was, he was in pain, and to affraid to say something, there is no other explanation.
No sense of focus or composition, everyone looks like they have 5 minutes of time and than have to run somwhere else, Camilla and Kate look ready to get up instantly.
Wonder what merrited the ''we need secrecy'' mindset, when the historic records  will reveal the Godparents.
Probably Markle's PR mindset, create controversy  to get publicity, works for her so far.
Fans are in awe, the critics get silenced fast.
Logged
thecrownjewelthief

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 595

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2123





Ignore
« Reply #470 on: July 07, 2019, 09:45:51 PM »

If people really think Kate wore Diana's earrings to spite Meghan then they don't know Kate all.

Kate only does that type of thing to other women she perceives as a threat to her territory. To something she either has or wants. Her way of saying "Mine! Mine! Stay away!" She only that type of thing when it comes to William. Certainly not for public/press attention cause she could care less about either of those.

So unless she really does perceive Meghan as a personal threat (I doubt it) she probably just thought christening for Diana's grandson equals let's wear Diana's earrings yay isn't that cute.  


I thought the same thing - she probably just thought it was cute since theyíre what was worn to Harryís christening.
Logged
Lady Alice

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 2106

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 5966





Ignore
« Reply #471 on: July 07, 2019, 10:05:16 PM »

The joys of photoshop's liquify tools, Markle lost 10 kg of weight since Friday, and baby magicaly became more ''caucasian'' looking, just like his mum declared on her modeling page .
Harry's left shoulder is moved towards Markle, and has a massive ''burn'' error to hide the movement. Markles shoulder where the merge happend has a ''dodge'' error.
Whoever the poor person that had to do the photos was, he was in pain, and to affraid to say something, there is no other explanation.
No sense of focus or composition, everyone looks like they have 5 minutes of time and than have to run somwhere else, Camilla and Kate look ready to get up instantly.
Wonder what merrited the ''we need secrecy'' mindset, when the historic records  will reveal the Godparents.
Probably Markle's PR mindset, create controversy  to get publicity, works for her so far.
Fans are in awe, the critics get silenced fast.


It's almost like they took Sparky's head/neck from the wedding photos and put it in there. Otherwise she's on some horse-level prescription diuretics to lose that much weight in less than a week, and was also dipped in a vat of bleach.

So much for being pro-feminist and woke - she can't even stand having her own real body and face out there in official pics.
Logged

Lady Willoughby

Warned
Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1507

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 4448


Circa Regna Tonat




Ignore
« Reply #472 on: July 07, 2019, 10:06:25 PM »

If William and Kate can "wrangle" their kids to their friend's weddings (people they have little to no blood relations with) then they can surely "wrangle" them to their own first cousins christening. They just didn't want to which of course tells A LOT.

Everyone looks like they're there because they feel like they have to be. Their expressions read, "let's get this effing thing over with so we can go back to stuff we want to do."

It's all really sad and pathetic. And those little tributes to Diana (Kate's earrings, the couch) mean nothing when the two people she loved more then anything are acting as they are, especially towards each other.

If the situation is as toxic and uncomfortable as the pictures make it seem, no parents would want to drag their children into it. If the Cambridge kids were not there it was probably a mutual relief.
Logged

Curtains

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1644

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 3526





Ignore
« Reply #473 on: July 07, 2019, 10:18:46 PM »

If William and Kate can "wrangle" their kids to their friend's weddings (people they have little to no blood relations with) then they can surely "wrangle" them to their own first cousins christening. They just didn't want to which of course tells A LOT.

Everyone looks like they're there because they feel like they have to be. Their expressions read, "let's get this effing thing over with so we can go back to stuff we want to do."

It's all really sad and pathetic. And those little tributes to Diana (Kate's earrings, the couch) mean nothing when the two people she loved more then anything are acting as they are, especially towards each other.

We donít actually know if the Cambridge children were or were not there. We donít have a guest list or really any information, just these two photos. I think itís a bit unfair to make the leap that the Cambridge children were invited but that Wills & Kate withheld them out of spite. What we do know is that the maternal grandfatherís invite was withheld, IMO out of spite, but almost nothing else.
Logged

"Some of it's magic, and some of it's tragic: but I had a good life, all the way." - Jimmy Buffet, America's premiere poet
Lady G

Large Member
******

Reputation: 713

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 1485





Ignore
« Reply #474 on: July 07, 2019, 10:34:27 PM »

If William and Kate can "wrangle" their kids to their friend's weddings (people they have little to no blood relations with) then they can surely "wrangle" them to their own first cousins christening. They just didn't want to which of course tells A LOT.

Everyone looks like they're there because they feel like they have to be. Their expressions read, "let's get this effing thing over with so we can go back to stuff we want to do."

It's all really sad and pathetic. And those little tributes to Diana (Kate's earrings, the couch) mean nothing when the two people she loved more then anything are acting as they are, especially towards each other.

We donít actually know if the Cambridge children were or were not there. We donít have a guest list or really any information, just these two photos. I think itís a bit unfair to make the leap that the Cambridge children were invited but that Wills & Kate withheld them out of spite. What we do know is that the maternal grandfatherís invite was withheld, IMO out of spite, but almost nothing else.

Well, he was there in DNA. Talk about karma - Me-again ghosts her dad but has to see him every time she looks at her own son 
Logged

"Cowards falter, but danger is often overcome by those who nobly dare."
Margaret

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1437

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 4130





Ignore
« Reply #475 on: July 07, 2019, 11:48:42 PM »

So the Christening photo was taken in the same place as the wedding photo, with William and kate in almost the exact same place





Same room, different position.  If you look behind William and to his left in each photo you'll see in the wedding photo there is a decorated door behind him and then another green panel and then the corner, whereas in the Christening photo next to his left shoulder there is a gold panel which is adjacent to the corner.

I don't mind the Christening photo.  I think Meghan and Harry look very happy and Archie looks very sweet.  Everyone else except sourpuss Willie looks fine, IMO.  The most interesting thing about the photo is that one of Diana's sisters looks like she thought she was going to the tennis or a cricket match; maybe she was dashing off to such an event afterwards.
Logged
Lord G°n

Medium Member
*****

Reputation: 216

Offline Offline

Posts: 945





Ignore
« Reply #476 on: July 08, 2019, 12:11:24 AM »

So the Christening photo was taken in the same place as the wedding photo, with William and kate in almost the exact same place





Same room, different position.  If you look behind William and to his left in each photo you'll see in the wedding photo there is a decorated door behind him and then another green panel and then the corner, whereas in the Christening photo next to his left shoulder there is a gold panel which is adjacent to the corner.

I don't mind the Christening photo.  I think Meghan and Harry look very happy and Archie looks very sweet.  Everyone else except sourpuss Willie looks fine, IMO.  The most interesting thing about the photo is that one of Diana's sisters looks like she thought she was going to the tennis or a cricket match; maybe she was dashing off to such an event afterwards.
Yes, with her younger nephew ...
Logged
getafix

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 3713

Offline Offline

Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, British

Posts: 20053


Bye-Bye MEDiana Who!!!!




Ignore
« Reply #477 on: July 08, 2019, 12:47:02 AM »

So unless she really does perceive Meghan as a personal threat (I doubt it) she probably just thought christening for Diana's grandson equals let's wear Diana's earrings yay isn't that cute. 


I agree, iI think it's one of those nice/overthought nods to the past which Kate seems to like.

great. but why isn't chiookie wearing the earrings then?

G Smiley
Logged

ANDREW DENTON: Yes. What did... When you first met, what did you see in each other? CROWN PRINCE FREDERIK: What did we see in each other? We saw... Well, it's a bit hard. It's a bit blurry, in a way, because it was just after the Olympics had started and it was one of those evenings where...
tsarinya

Small Member
****

Reputation: 154

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 492





Ignore
« Reply #478 on: July 08, 2019, 01:21:17 AM »

So unless she really does perceive Meghan as a personal threat (I doubt it) she probably just thought christening for Diana's grandson equals let's wear Diana's earrings yay isn't that cute. 


I agree, iI think it's one of those nice/overthought nods to the past which Kate seems to like.

great. but why isn't chiookie wearing the earrings then?

G Smiley

Maybe William inherited them?
Tbf, if I had earrings that had that much meaning for the day, id wear them to. I thought it was a nice gesture. Plus I donít think they are Meghanís style.
Logged
Celia

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 790

Offline Offline

Posts: 3102





Ignore
« Reply #479 on: July 08, 2019, 01:35:49 AM »

Re Meghan's apparent weight loss:  she is probably going for that "look how fast I lost the baby weight!" thing that so many celebrities post about all over the interwebs.  As has been pointed out, it took nine months to gain that weight, it can take nine months to lose it.  Trying to do so too fast can't be healthy (mentally or physically).
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 37   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: