cordtx
Warned
|
Plus , most of us do this every day I would imagine, but we don’t have to go around bragging about it or make it into some big PR deal. I’m sure Meghan has never done a thing in her life that didn’t benefit her so she doesn’t understand. But thanks for the lesson weirdos 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Crayon
Most Exalted Member
Reputation: 4201
Offline
Posts: 15042
"Near catastrophic"
|
Surely the Sussex version would be, "Carry out a planned act of kindness, with expectation of reward, safe in the knowledge that your creepy make up artist friend will leak it to the American media for you"
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cool your jets, everyone
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lady Liebe
|
Plus , most of us do this every day I would imagine, but we don’t have to go around bragging about it or make it into some big PR deal. I’m sure Meghan has never done a thing in her life that didn’t benefit her so she doesn’t understand. But thanks for the lesson weirdos  
|
|
|
Logged
|
All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism. Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
LittleThunder
|
I missed that June article, but thanks to Tumblr, found it today. Did you know about this ex-girlfriend. I never heard about her her before today. It seems the press is digging out the old files. "Who is Sarah Ann Macklin - the woman Prince Harry dated AFTER he met Meghan Markle? MEGHAN MARKLE, 37, and Prince Harry, 34, married in May 2018. According to a royal author Harry dated Burberry model Sarah Ann Macklin after he first met the then-actress. So who is she?"https://www.express.co.uk...lin-burberry-prince-harry
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaiserin
|
Imagine, I DO random acts of kindness, and this no matter if someone would do the same to me one day. I just do it because I feel to. And it makes me happy when the other lightens up. And if the other doesn't even recognise it - I know what I did. That's enough.
People who always expect something in return can't understand this.
That's why the douchebags posted the Diana quote. They had nothing else to say today, but expected 1,000,000 heart & love posts back.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gildinwen
Mini Member
 
Reputation: 57
Offline
 United Kingdom
Posts: 307
|
Imagine, I DO random acts of kindness, and this no matter if someone would do the same to me one day. I just do it because I feel to. And it makes me happy when the other lightens up. And if the other doesn't even recognise it - I know what I did. That's enough.
People who always expect something in return can't understand this.
That's why the douchebags posted the Diana quote. They had nothing else to say today, but expected 1,000,000 heart & love posts back.
There's literally a comment on their insta from someone talking about how they give food to the homeless on Diana's birthday to honour her from across the pond. Like.....what about the other days of the year?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maria
|
‘Prince Harry gave a barefoot speech at a secretive Google Camp climate change conference in Italy according to reports, in front of an A-List crowd who flew in on 114 private jets. The Duke of Sussex is said to have given a passionate speech about saving the planet while being watched by Naomi Campbell and Leonardo DiCaprio, among other celebrities and power brokers.‘
So as I say, not as I do, eh?
An elite crowd flies, in private jets, to gather at a secretive conference in a luxurious location. The more I read about this the more I can't help but think that Harry just got initiated into a cult. His speech, while barefoot  , was like the test he had to perform to prove himself worthy before being accepted into the "club." It's all very creepy  This is exactly what it is. A cult. A cult to produce new taxes for the peasants and other regulations (which of course doesn't apply for the rich and famous). Since no one today believes in the concept of sins anymore and even less so would be paying for their forgiveness, the control has now been replaced by the climate cult. The simple truth is Co2 is not bad for the environment. It was much higher during the age of the dinosaurs (just look at the plants growing back then). It's about 0,038 %in the atmosphere, of which humans are responsible for about 0,00152 (4% of the above) or something similar. You can google it, if you don't believe me. Does anyone really believe that selling no Diesel cars changes anything in the climate or that someone can regulate and control how much the temperature rises? Sorry than you can also believe in flying pigs. Climate fanatics like Greta are cult leaders nothing more. we host a site with discussions about royals. Definitely NOT global warming and politics so no more of this.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kristallinchen
|
‘Prince Harry gave a barefoot speech at a secretive Google Camp climate change conference in Italy according to reports, in front of an A-List crowd who flew in on 114 private jets. The Duke of Sussex is said to have given a passionate speech about saving the planet while being watched by Naomi Campbell and Leonardo DiCaprio, among other celebrities and power brokers.‘
So as I say, not as I do, eh?
An elite crowd flies, in private jets, to gather at a secretive conference in a luxurious location. The more I read about this the more I can't help but think that Harry just got initiated into a cult. His speech, while barefoot  , was like the test he had to perform to prove himself worthy before being accepted into the "club." It's all very creepy  This is exactly what it is. A cult. A cult to produce new taxes for the peasants and other regulations (which of course doesn't apply for the rich and famous). Since no one today believes in the concept of sins anymore and even less so would be paying for their forgiveness, the control has now been replaced by the climate cult. The simple truth is Co2 is not bad for the environment. It was much higher during the age of the dinosaurs (just look at the plants growing back then). It's about 0,038 %in the atmosphere, of which humans are responsible for about 0,00152 (4% of the above) or something similar. You can google it, if you don't believe me. Does anyone really believe that selling no Diesel cars changes anything in the climate or that someone can regulate and control how much the temperature rises? Sorry than you can also believe in flying pigs. Climate fanatics like Greta are cult leaders nothing more. we host a site with discussions about royals. Definitely NOT global warming and politics so no more of this.Sorry, Maria, it won't happen again.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kristallinchen
|
Imagine, I DO random acts of kindness, and this no matter if someone would do the same to me one day. I just do it because I feel to. And it makes me happy when the other lightens up. And if the other doesn't even recognise it - I know what I did. That's enough.
People who always expect something in return can't understand this.
That's why the douchebags posted the Diana quote. They had nothing else to say today, but expected 1,000,000 heart & love posts back.
ITA 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
LittleThunder
|
"Revealed: Prince Harry 'stayed on a gas guzzling super-yacht for Google's green summit' - as Expedia billionaire Barry Diller reveals the royal spoke about saving the planet by taking fewer selfies at 'trampled' holiday destinations * Prince Harry facing renewed controversy over his trip to Google's 'green' summit * He was a guest on one of giant vessels moored near Verdura Golf & Spa Resort * 390ft super-yacht produces about 3.3 tons of carbon dioxide each hour * Many of the well-heeled guests arrived by private plane to the climate summit "https://www.dailymail.co....Googles-green-summit.htmlVessels spotted during the Google Camp – an annual event launched by the tech giant's founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin in 2012 –included the 300ft Eos, owned by Expedia billionaire Barry Diller, and Infinity, the 290ft yacht belonging to former Google boss Eric Schmidt.
Last night Mr Diller, 77, denied Harry, 34, had joined celebrities including Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom on his yacht, but praised the Prince's 'eloquent' speech – which he reportedly delivered barefoot – about trying to save the planet by taking fewer selfies.
'He was saying there are many holiday destinations that because of Instagram and other things are getting trampled by people taking selfies, and these places... are overwhelmed with tourism,' Mr Diller told The Mail on Sunday.
'The principal argument he was making was the need to actually expand people's interest in places that are not so obviously 'selfie-ised'. It should be a goal to expand where people go for tourism, so these very few places with an enormous concentration of tourists would get some relief. According to witnesses, Harry arrived at one event with John Elkann, boss of Fiat Chrysler.
The car-making firm was recently forced to recall 863,000 vehicles that violate emission standards following a ruling by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
Buckingham Palace last night declined to comment. Well, there's no surprise here.  And the comment section...  Harry and his lord and master wife are doing a great damage to the monarchy. I spot more and more comments about ending it. "Prince Harry 'thinnest skinned' royal as 'bristling' Duke 'curses' at staff - shock claim PRINCE HARRY was criticised for being unable to cope with the bad press he sometimes receives and was accused of having the "thinnest skin" in the Royal Family - unlike Meghan Markle who does not even read what the media writes about her."https://www.express.co.uk...test-UK-press-Dan-Wootton
|
|
« Last Edit: August 11, 2019, 10:19:28 PM by LittleThunder, Reason: added a comment »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
perdie
|
"Revealed: Prince Harry 'stayed on a gas guzzling super-yacht for Google's green summit' - as Expedia billionaire Barry Diller reveals the royal spoke about saving the planet by taking fewer selfies at 'trampled' holiday destinations * Prince Harry facing renewed controversy over his trip to Google's 'green' summit * He was a guest on one of giant vessels moored near Verdura Golf & Spa Resort * 390ft super-yacht produces about 3.3 tons of carbon dioxide each hour * Many of the well-heeled guests arrived by private plane to the climate summit "https://www.dailymail.co....Googles-green-summit.htmlVessels spotted during the Google Camp – an annual event launched by the tech giant's founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin in 2012 –included the 300ft Eos, owned by Expedia billionaire Barry Diller, and Infinity, the 290ft yacht belonging to former Google boss Eric Schmidt.
Last night Mr Diller, 77, denied Harry, 34, had joined celebrities including Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom on his yacht, but praised the Prince's 'eloquent' speech – which he reportedly delivered barefoot – about trying to save the planet by taking fewer selfies.
'He was saying there are many holiday destinations that because of Instagram and other things are getting trampled by people taking selfies, and these places... are overwhelmed with tourism,' Mr Diller told The Mail on Sunday.
'The principal argument he was making was the need to actually expand people's interest in places that are not so obviously 'selfie-ised'. It should be a goal to expand where people go for tourism, so these very few places with an enormous concentration of tourists would get some relief. According to witnesses, Harry arrived at one event with John Elkann, boss of Fiat Chrysler.
The car-making firm was recently forced to recall 863,000 vehicles that violate emission standards following a ruling by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
Buckingham Palace last night declined to comment. Well, there's no surprise here.  And the comment section...  Harry and his lord and master wife are doing a great damage to the monarchy. I spot more and more comments about ending it. "Prince Harry 'thinnest skinned' royal as 'bristling' Duke 'curses' at staff - shock claim PRINCE HARRY was criticised for being unable to cope with the bad press he sometimes receives and was accused of having the "thinnest skin" in the Royal Family - unlike Meghan Markle who does not even read what the media writes about her."https://www.express.co.uk...test-UK-press-Dan-Wootton So, he's arguing that to save the planet, we should fly to, trample over and take selfies at less popular destinations? Which also ignores the fact that many people decide to go to other cities on holiday, which involves a little less trampling than suggesting to visit more wildlife/scenic type places. Of course a tourism advocate like the Expedia owner will approve. Shut up Harry.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Celia
|
Megan doesn't read her own press?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
ralf103
|
Given he can visit these places anytime he likes without having millions of people round him I find it ironic he suggests the average person on the street should find more money to go to even more exotic locations for hols. Sorry Harry we can't all afford to fly to Africa all the time for our hols.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret
|
"Revealed: Prince Harry 'stayed on a gas guzzling super-yacht for Google's green summit' - as Expedia billionaire Barry Diller reveals the royal spoke about saving the planet by taking fewer selfies at 'trampled' holiday destinations * Prince Harry facing renewed controversy over his trip to Google's 'green' summit * He was a guest on one of giant vessels moored near Verdura Golf & Spa Resort * 390ft super-yacht produces about 3.3 tons of carbon dioxide each hour * Many of the well-heeled guests arrived by private plane to the climate summit "https://www.dailymail.co....Googles-green-summit.htmlVessels spotted during the Google Camp – an annual event launched by the tech giant's founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin in 2012 –included the 300ft Eos, owned by Expedia billionaire Barry Diller, and Infinity, the 290ft yacht belonging to former Google boss Eric Schmidt.
Last night Mr Diller, 77, denied Harry, 34, had joined celebrities including Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom on his yacht, but praised the Prince's 'eloquent' speech – which he reportedly delivered barefoot – about trying to save the planet by taking fewer selfies.
'He was saying there are many holiday destinations that because of Instagram and other things are getting trampled by people taking selfies, and these places... are overwhelmed with tourism,' Mr Diller told The Mail on Sunday.
'The principal argument he was making was the need to actually expand people's interest in places that are not so obviously 'selfie-ised'. It should be a goal to expand where people go for tourism, so these very few places with an enormous concentration of tourists would get some relief. According to witnesses, Harry arrived at one event with John Elkann, boss of Fiat Chrysler.
The car-making firm was recently forced to recall 863,000 vehicles that violate emission standards following a ruling by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
Buckingham Palace last night declined to comment. Well, there's no surprise here.  And the comment section...  Harry and his lord and master wife are doing a great damage to the monarchy. I spot more and more comments about ending it. "Prince Harry 'thinnest skinned' royal as 'bristling' Duke 'curses' at staff - shock claim PRINCE HARRY was criticised for being unable to cope with the bad press he sometimes receives and was accused of having the "thinnest skin" in the Royal Family - unlike Meghan Markle who does not even read what the media writes about her."https://www.express.co.uk...test-UK-press-Dan-Wootton So, he's arguing that to save the planet, we should fly to, trample over and take selfies at less popular destinations? Which also ignores the fact that many people decide to go to other cities on holiday, which involves a little less trampling than suggesting to visit more wildlife/scenic type places. Of course a tourism advocate like the Expedia owner will approve. Shut up Harry. No, no, no, you misunderstand him. He is right. What he is saying is that stop people travelling to these very popular overseas destinations where people want to take selfies so they can prove they were the, people should go to the less glamorous plac that are closer to home and where the holiday pound benefits Britain and does not do as much damage to the environment because of aviation fuel, etc. I am sure this means that instead of travelling overseas from now on he and his wife are going to be taking their holidays at places like Cornwall and Loch Ness. And going on lots of inexpensive walking holudays. https://www.kayak.co.uk/m...gazine/unknown-places-uk/  Surely that's what he means. He cannot possibly mean what it seems like he said. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kristallinchen
|
Megan doesn't read her own press? Of course she reads it. She just ignores the non praising comments considering them hatespeech.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|