Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: UFO No More 2020 Tally  (Read 1798 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Oh_Caroline

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1657

Offline Offline

Posts: 6280





Ignore
« on: January 01, 2021, 04:52:06 PM »

https://ufonomore.com/blo.../how-much-is-it-all-worth

Just a few thoughts...thinking about the recent discussion regards Kate's new jewelry pieces and whether or not the Van Cleef and Arpels pieces worn at the BAFTAs (valued at £13,250) and the Asprey Earrings worn in Ireland (valued at £17,300) were gifts it's my guess that UFO included these pieces as KP never disclosed their providence.  In my personal opinion gifts (even from other royals) with large price tags (say 5K and up) should be disclosed as until they are it will be assumed that the pieces were purchased by the wearer.  Should those pieces actual be gifts that would drop Kate to 52,500 euros (still in second place but not quite so shocking).

I do love how Letizia has the second highest number of new pieces but is 10th in terms of known cost and 13th in terms of price per piece (that had a cost associated).  She needs to run a master class for most other royals...how to dress well with other blowing the budget.
Logged
anastasia beaverhausen

Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 1768

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 7087





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2021, 01:28:48 AM »

https://ufonomore.com/blo.../how-much-is-it-all-worth

Just a few thoughts...thinking about the recent discussion regards Kate's new jewelry pieces and whether or not the Van Cleef and Arpels pieces worn at the BAFTAs (valued at £13,250) and the Asprey Earrings worn in Ireland (valued at £17,300) were gifts it's my guess that UFO included these pieces as KP never disclosed their providence.  In my personal opinion gifts (even from other royals) with large price tags (say 5K and up) should be disclosed as until they are it will be assumed that the pieces were purchased by the wearer.  Should those pieces actual be gifts that would drop Kate to 52,500 euros (still in second place but not quite so shocking).

I do love how Letizia has the second highest number of new pieces but is 10th in terms of known cost and 13th in terms of price per piece (that had a cost associated).  She needs to run a master class for most other royals...how to dress well with other blowing the budget.

Great site OC!   Star

I agree with your observations but wonder why Meghan is even on this list considering she flounced off to California, and how did Snakey spend more than the actual Crown Princess?  Like Dolly Parton said:  it takes a lot of money to look this cheap!
Logged
Oh_Caroline

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1657

Offline Offline

Posts: 6280





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2021, 01:49:32 AM »

They cover both working and non-working royal women.  Hence the inclusion of Beatrice, Eugenie, Maddie, and the unmentionable.  They also did a blog post last week where the said their going to start covering Mathilde and Elisabeth for the 2021 tally (and on).  Hopefully they’ll keep adding various ladies...Stephanie of Luxembourg would be a great one.

I hadn’t noticed that about Sofia...as always you’re right.
Logged
fairy

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 5136

Offline Offline

Posts: 21629





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2024, 08:55:06 PM »

I am actually quite shocked that Eugenie is so high on the list. She is fairly low in rank and I have my doubts as to her husbands bank account - I would certainly assume it is lower than that of her brother in low. And while Beatrice is also obscenely high up, she is just a tad more than half her sisters.
Logged
genegal43

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 785

Offline Offline

Posts: 4556



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2024, 09:00:16 PM »

Eugenie was high, I was surprised at that too.
Logged

Need a documentary for the classroom?  Hit me up here: https://historydoctube.weebly.com/
Genealogy: shrinking the world one person at a time!
VanillaMoomin

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 385

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 1715





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2024, 09:31:05 PM »

I am actually quite shocked that Eugenie is so high on the list. She is fairly low in rank and I have my doubts as to her husbands bank account - I would certainly assume it is lower than that of her brother in low. And while Beatrice is also obscenely high up, she is just a tad more than half her sisters.


I would imagine she gets a lot of free/discounted clothing that UFONM is counting at full price. She’s often in the papers if she wears something new, so giving her clothes is good business for the designers.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: