karma chamelion
Warned
|
I thought Bea, Zara, and Peter looked really very nice, but great turn out for the family (90% that is  ) Old Philip is certainly looking every one of his 97 years now. I can just imagine him going like mid-March... I feel the same when I look at him. I just hope he goes quickly after a happy day enjoying carriage driving or something, and doesn't languish in bed for ages slowly fading. I have to say I was concerned seeing his photo. As to passing, I'm stuck on the image of him sitting in front of the fireplace with a snifter of good scotch and his dogs around his feet, taking a nap  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lady Alice
|
Meghan's dress is a most appropriate choice for her. The design was influenced by the life of Adele Astaire, a vaudeville dancer turned Irish aristocrat.  Adele had more class in her pinkybthan Meggles ever will. And remember also that her brother was the ever classy, legendary Fred. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rita
|
nice to see Philip although he is looking frail Zara and Eugenie lokk lovely i like the color of Kate dreass but sems like something boring with bow as her usualself Meg with the tons of Make up is a no for me |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
royalviewers
Warned
Mini Member
Reputation: 35
 Offline
 Indonesia
Posts: 245
|
Now this is interesting. On a non-pregnant model, the underslip stops at about crotch level. I can imagine that on the PREGNANT duch-a$$, it ends about at navel level, and the overdress is sheer. Did she think people would want to see where babies are born? Is she going to be one of those truly disastrous females who carry on ad nauseum about their episiotomies? I hope everyone avoided her like the plague and shuffled her and Harry off to the infants table. Oh Did I love you! Judging from the pic of her sitting at "Today Show" in 2016 the Fail presented us, this dress was already too tight in the upper arms and bust area back then. I just can't believe how she would shot herself into it right now, with like 6 kilos more? this is what she intended to do, to show her sugars, and the world that even though she's 6 month pregnant she still fit the dress....so the sugars will praise her again n again n again  to me she looks like a squeeze banana |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAOTMAA
|
George seems to be sporting those unfortunate dark circles under the eyes like Kate had as a child  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lynda
|
has Camilla's two children ever been invited to the "family" lunch? Or any function?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh_Caroline
|
Not stuff like this...no in-laws (stepchildren) are...other stuff I'm not as sure. They keep a pretty low profile...not as low a others but still low. I remember pictures of C&C with some of her grandchildren at a county fair type event.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
calliope
Baby Member
Reputation: 8
Offline
 United Kingdom
Posts: 22
|
has Camilla's two children ever been invited to the "family" lunch? Or any function?
I've never seen the Parker-Bowles children at an event such as this before, or any royal event for that matter, as far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong). I think they prefer staying out of the spotlight. The only time I've heard of anything related to Camilla's children in recent years was when her granddaughter (Eliza?) was a bridesmaid at Will & Kate's wedding. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Stuart
|
Tom Parker Bowles occasionally appears on television in his capacity as a food writer, I don't think he mentions his mother very often though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pixiecat
|
Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.
Isn’t she with Mike and Zara? No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too. Why do Louise and James still have a nanny?  . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kpzra
|
Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.
Isn’t she with Mike and Zara? No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too. Why do Louise and James still have a nanny? . Considering Louise was in the front seat and James wasn't with him Mom and sister I'm not sure who Molly means. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh_Caroline
|
Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.
Isn’t she with Mike and Zara? No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too. Why do Louise and James still have a nanny? . Their still under 18, their parent travel and have evening engagements, their grandparents are older and have their own work, their aunts and uncles are busy and can’t pitch in, working for royals involve a lot of background/security checks so sitters are out, etc. The cousins all had nannies until college. And at this age it is more just an adult presence than anything else. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pixiecat
|
Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.
Isn’t she with Mike and Zara? No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too. Why do Louise and James still have a nanny? . Their still under 18, their parent travel and have evening engagements, their grandparents are older and have their own work, their aunts and uncles are busy and can’t pitch in, working for royals involve a lot of background/security checks so sitters are out, etc. The cousins all had nannies until college. And at this age it is more just an adult presence than anything else. I understand the need for a nanny when the parents are away; however, there is literally no legitimate reason why these older children need a nanny to accompany them to a family event where their parents and other adult relatives are present. It's not like they need assistance cutting their food or using the toilet.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
