Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 ... 194 195 [196] 197 198 199   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: British Royal News.  (Read 800631 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jolene

Large Member
******

Reputation: 287

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 1408





Ignore
« Reply #2925 on: December 19, 2018, 06:29:27 PM »

Apparently Imedia wore this Erdem (non maternity) dress ($3725): http://www.selfridges.com...238-3001228-AW1820351BLEO

And Bea wore a River Island coat ($200--an apparent repeat): https://us.riverisland.co...g-sleeve-wool-coat-728336

Maybe I'm imagining it, but it seems lately that Meg is the only female member of the fam going buck wild with clothing expenses.

Kate rewore a Stella McCartney dress.
Logged
royalviewers

Warned
Mini Member
***

Reputation: 35

Offline Offline

Indonesia Indonesia

Posts: 245





Ignore
« Reply #2926 on: December 19, 2018, 06:34:34 PM »

Apparently Imedia wore this Erdem (non maternity) dress ($3725): http://www.selfridges.com...238-3001228-AW1820351BLEO

And Bea wore a River Island coat ($200): https://us.riverisland.co...g-sleeve-wool-coat-728336

Maybe I'm imagining it, but it seems lately that Meg is the only female member of the fam going buck wild with clothing expenses.
imo she is trying to push herself to the limit so the other brf n the nation believe she's hard working humanitarian actress whose already rich before harry and she's so super worthy that only super expensive clothes suits her.
Meanwhile the other member of the brf do the opposites  Whistle
Logged
Future Crayon

Most Exalted Member
*

Reputation: 3678

Offline Offline

Posts: 13261


Til and Phil fan account




Ignore
« Reply #2927 on: December 19, 2018, 06:34:55 PM »

Is Kate re-wearing that pink bow-neck Stella McCartney she wore to some BRF party years and years ago?
Logged

Cool your jets, everyone
jolene

Large Member
******

Reputation: 287

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 1408





Ignore
« Reply #2928 on: December 19, 2018, 06:36:05 PM »

Is Kate re-wearing that pink bow-neck Stella McCartney she wore to some BRF party years and years ago?
Yes, it's from Stella's spring 2009 line.

Bea's coat is also a repeat.
Logged
Molly2101

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 547

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 2840





Ignore
« Reply #2929 on: December 19, 2018, 07:41:48 PM »

Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.

Isnít she with Mike and Zara?

No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too.

Are you sure for the Wessex nanny? Louise is sitting in the front seat next to her mother.


James and Louise were with edward when they left. The nanny's with them. https://previews.rexfeatu...37ef6d9d83dba564db5b63e6c

Was Eugenie there? I didn't see any pictures of her or Jack.

Nice to see Ed has updated his glasses. He looks younger.
Logged

"All my heart is yours, sir: it belongs to you; and with you it would remain, were fate to exile the rest of me from your presence forever." Jane Eyre, Charlotte Bronte.
Diogenes
Board Helper
Gigantic Member
************

Reputation: 1082

Offline Offline

Posts: 4454





Ignore
« Reply #2930 on: December 19, 2018, 08:04:02 PM »

Apparently Imedia wore this Erdem (non maternity) dress ($3725): http://www.selfridges.com...238-3001228-AW1820351BLEO

Maybe I'm imagining it, but it seems lately that Meg is the only female member of the fam going buck wild with clothing expenses.

Now this is interesting.  On a non-pregnant model, the underslip stops at about crotch level.  I can imagine that on the PREGNANT duch-a$$, it ends about at navel level, and the overdress is sheer.  Did she think people would want to see where babies are born?  Is she going to be one of those truly disastrous females who carry on ad nauseum about their episiotomies?

I hope everyone avoided her like the plague and shuffled her and Harry off to the infants table.



Logged
leatherface

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1471

Offline Offline

Nigeria Nigeria

Posts: 4225





Ignore
« Reply #2931 on: December 19, 2018, 08:05:13 PM »

Apparently Imedia wore this Erdem (non maternity) dress ($3725): http://www.selfridges.com...238-3001228-AW1820351BLEO

Maybe I'm imagining it, but it seems lately that Meg is the only female member of the fam going buck wild with clothing expenses.

Now this is interesting.  On a non-pregnant model, the underslip stops at about crotch level.  I can imagine that on the PREGNANT duch-a$$, it ends about at navel level, and the overdress is sheer.  Did she think people would want to see where babies are born?  Is she going to be one of those truly disastrous females who carry on ad nauseum about their episiotomies?

I hope everyone avoided her like the plague and shuffled her and Harry off to the infants table.





Oh Did I love you!
Logged
lothwen

Warned
Big Member
*******

Reputation: 826

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2074





Ignore
« Reply #2932 on: December 19, 2018, 08:19:15 PM »

Apparently Imedia wore this Erdem (non maternity) dress ($3725): http://www.selfridges.com...238-3001228-AW1820351BLEO

And Bea wore a River Island coat ($200--an apparent repeat): https://us.riverisland.co...g-sleeve-wool-coat-728336

Maybe I'm imagining it, but it seems lately that Meg is the only female member of the fam going buck wild with clothing expenses.

Kate rewore a Stella McCartney dress.

I really hope thatís not the dress Meghan is wearing. With her bump itís way too short, especially the slip underneath.

For reference, I wore a maternity dress yesterday where the slip reached my knees when I was standing. When I sat down, however, you could almost see the baby....
Logged
thecrownjewelthief

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 583

Online Online

United States United States

Posts: 2064





Ignore
« Reply #2933 on: December 19, 2018, 08:29:53 PM »

According to the DM, Meghan's dress is an Erdem repeat from her pre-Harry days: https://www.dailymail.co....ch-Buckingham-Palace.html

The fabric on Kate's looks totally different to me than the previous dress but maybe it's the light.
Logged
Sondra Finchley

Huge Member
********

Reputation: 1023

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 2637





Ignore
« Reply #2934 on: December 19, 2018, 09:08:28 PM »

I thought Bea, Zara, and Peter looked really very nice, but great turn out for the family (90% that is Smiley)

Old Philip is certainly looking every one of his 97 years now. I can just imagine him going like mid-March...
Logged
Kaiserin

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1842

Offline Offline

Germany Germany

Posts: 4291





Ignore
« Reply #2935 on: December 19, 2018, 09:49:59 PM »

Apparently Imedia wore this Erdem (non maternity) dress ($3725): http://www.selfridges.com...238-3001228-AW1820351BLEO

Maybe I'm imagining it, but it seems lately that Meg is the only female member of the fam going buck wild with clothing expenses.

Now this is interesting.  On a non-pregnant model, the underslip stops at about crotch level.  I can imagine that on the PREGNANT duch-a$$, it ends about at navel level, and the overdress is sheer.  Did she think people would want to see where babies are born?  Is she going to be one of those truly disastrous females who carry on ad nauseum about their episiotomies?

I hope everyone avoided her like the plague and shuffled her and Harry off to the infants table.





Oh Did I love you!
Judging from the pic of her sitting at "Today Show" in 2016 the Fail presented us, this dress was already too tight in the upper arms and bust area back then. I just can't believe how she would shot herself into it right now, with like 6 kilos more?
Logged
Margaret

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1435

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 4124





Ignore
« Reply #2936 on: December 19, 2018, 09:58:13 PM »

Meghan's dress is a most appropriate choice for her.  The design was influenced by the life of Adele Astaire, a vaudeville dancer turned Irish aristocrat. 
Logged
karma chamelion

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 846

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 3187





Ignore
« Reply #2937 on: December 19, 2018, 10:00:29 PM »

Meghan's dress is a most appropriate choice for her.  The design was influenced by the life of Adele Astaire, a vaudeville dancer turned Irish aristocrat. 

Laugh bounce Star
Logged
Kaiserin

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1842

Offline Offline

Germany Germany

Posts: 4291





Ignore
« Reply #2938 on: December 19, 2018, 10:01:50 PM »

Meghan's dress is a most appropriate choice for her.  The design was influenced by the life of Adele Astaire, a vaudeville dancer turned Irish aristocrat. 
Given that she bought it 2016 already, one may assume she had an agenda ... which culminated in the white "Blessed" dress she wore in Sydney harbour then.
Logged
Margaret

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 1435

Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 4124





Ignore
« Reply #2939 on: December 19, 2018, 10:07:12 PM »

I thought Bea, Zara, and Peter looked really very nice, but great turn out for the family (90% that is Smiley)

Old Philip is certainly looking every one of his 97 years now. I can just imagine him going like mid-March...

Sad  I feel the same when I look at him.   I just hope he goes quickly after a happy day enjoying carriage driving or something, and doesn't languish in bed for ages slowly fading.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 194 195 [196] 197 198 199   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: