Please read here on how to use images on RoyalDish. - Please read the RoyalDish message on board purpose and rules.
Images containing full nudity or sexual activities are strongly forbidden on RoyalDish.


Pages: 1 ... 195 196 [197] 198 199   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: British Royal News.  (Read 794517 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
karma chamelion

Gigantic Member
*********

Reputation: 822

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 3082





Ignore
« Reply #2940 on: December 19, 2018, 11:21:18 PM »

I thought Bea, Zara, and Peter looked really very nice, but great turn out for the family (90% that is Smiley)

Old Philip is certainly looking every one of his 97 years now. I can just imagine him going like mid-March...

Sad  I feel the same when I look at him.   I just hope he goes quickly after a happy day enjoying carriage driving or something, and doesn't languish in bed for ages slowly fading.

I have to say I was concerned seeing his photo.

As to passing, I'm stuck on the image of him sitting in front of the fireplace with a snifter of good scotch and his dogs around his feet, taking a nap Cute
Logged
Lady Alice

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 2081

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 5850





Ignore
« Reply #2941 on: December 19, 2018, 11:24:36 PM »

Meghan's dress is a most appropriate choice for her.  The design was influenced by the life of Adele Astaire, a vaudeville dancer turned Irish aristocrat. 

Adele had more class in her pinkybthan Meggles ever will. And remember also that her brother was the ever classy, legendary Fred.
Logged

Duchess of Suffolk

Big Member
*******

Reputation: 497

Offline Offline

Posts: 2031





Ignore
« Reply #2942 on: December 19, 2018, 11:28:56 PM »

According to the DM, Meghan's dress is an Erdem repeat from her pre-Harry days: https://www.dailymail.co....ch-Buckingham-Palace.html

The fabric on Kate's looks totally different to me than the previous dress but maybe it's the light.

It looks different to me too, the 2011 one is more shiny
Logged

Rita

Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 1165

Offline Offline

Posts: 9570





Ignore
« Reply #2943 on: December 20, 2018, 12:19:47 AM »

nice to see Philip although he is looking frail Sad

Zara and Eugenie lokk lovely i like the color of Kate dreass but sems like something boring with bow as her usualself
Meg with the tons of Make up is a no for me
Logged


royalviewers

Warned
Mini Member
***

Reputation: 35

Offline Offline

Indonesia Indonesia

Posts: 244





Ignore
« Reply #2944 on: December 20, 2018, 12:25:34 AM »

Apparently Imedia wore this Erdem (non maternity) dress ($3725): http://www.selfridges.com...238-3001228-AW1820351BLEO

Maybe I'm imagining it, but it seems lately that Meg is the only female member of the fam going buck wild with clothing expenses.

Now this is interesting.  On a non-pregnant model, the underslip stops at about crotch level.  I can imagine that on the PREGNANT duch-a$$, it ends about at navel level, and the overdress is sheer.  Did she think people would want to see where babies are born?  Is she going to be one of those truly disastrous females who carry on ad nauseum about their episiotomies?

I hope everyone avoided her like the plague and shuffled her and Harry off to the infants table.





Oh Did I love you!
Judging from the pic of her sitting at "Today Show" in 2016 the Fail presented us, this dress was already too tight in the upper arms and bust area back then. I just can't believe how she would shot herself into it right now, with like 6 kilos more?

this is what she intended to do, to show her sugars, and the world that even though she's 6 month pregnant she still fit the dress....so the sugars will praise her again n again n again  Banana Banana to me she looks like a squeeze banana  Banana Banana
Logged
NAOTMAA

Medium Member
*****

Reputation: 333

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 816





Ignore
« Reply #2945 on: December 20, 2018, 02:53:13 AM »

George seems to be sporting those unfortunate dark circles under the eyes like Kate had as a child  Crap
Logged
Ghost

Medium Member
*****

Reputation: 256

Offline Offline

Romania Romania

Posts: 788





Ignore
« Reply #2946 on: December 20, 2018, 01:04:33 PM »

Apparently Louis was there too

https://www.instagram.com...t&igshid=xdcljddfvcay
Logged
lynda

Ginormous Member
***********

Reputation: 729

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 8365





Ignore
« Reply #2947 on: December 20, 2018, 04:31:37 PM »

has Camilla's two children ever been invited to the "family" lunch?      Or any function?
Logged
Oh_Caroline

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1242

Offline Offline

Posts: 4848





Ignore
« Reply #2948 on: December 20, 2018, 04:36:57 PM »

Not stuff like this...no in-laws (stepchildren) are...other stuff I'm not as sure.   They keep a pretty low profile...not as low a others but still low.   I remember pictures of C&C with some of her grandchildren at a county fair type event.
Logged
calliope

Baby Member
*

Reputation: 8

Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 22





Ignore
« Reply #2949 on: December 20, 2018, 04:55:01 PM »

has Camilla's two children ever been invited to the "family" lunch?      Or any function?

I've never seen the Parker-Bowles children at an event such as this before, or any royal event for that matter, as far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong). I think they prefer staying out of the spotlight. The only time I've heard of anything related to Camilla's children in recent years was when her granddaughter (Eliza?) was a bridesmaid at Will & Kate's wedding.
Logged
Mary Stuart

Large Member
******

Reputation: 402

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 1354





Ignore
« Reply #2950 on: December 20, 2018, 05:02:45 PM »

Tom Parker Bowles occasionally appears on television in his capacity as a food writer, I don't think he mentions his mother very often though.
Logged

pixiecat
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 5460

Offline Offline

Cuba Cuba

Posts: 33095


Pixiecat loves to Dish!




Ignore
« Reply #2951 on: December 20, 2018, 08:46:18 PM »

Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.

Isnít she with Mike and Zara?

No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too.

Why do Louise and James still have a nanny?  Crazy.
Logged
kpzra

Small Member
****

Reputation: 159

Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 551





Ignore
« Reply #2952 on: December 20, 2018, 09:47:20 PM »

Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.

Isnít she with Mike and Zara?

No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too.

Why do Louise and James still have a nanny?  Crazy.

Considering Louise was in the front seat and James wasn't with him Mom and sister I'm not sure who Molly means.
Logged
Oh_Caroline

Humongous Member
**********

Reputation: 1242

Offline Offline

Posts: 4848





Ignore
« Reply #2953 on: December 20, 2018, 09:52:31 PM »

Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.

Isnít she with Mike and Zara?

No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too.

Why do Louise and James still have a nanny?  Crazy.

Their still under 18, their parent travel and have evening engagements, their grandparents are older and have their own work, their aunts and uncles are busy and canít pitch in, working for royals involve a lot of background/security checks so sitters are out, etc.

The cousins all had nannies until college.  And at this age it is more just an adult presence than anything else.
Logged
pixiecat
Board Helper
Most Exalted Member
************

Reputation: 5460

Offline Offline

Cuba Cuba

Posts: 33095


Pixiecat loves to Dish!




Ignore
« Reply #2954 on: December 20, 2018, 10:03:14 PM »

Was Camilla not at the lunch? I don't see her in Charles' car.

Isnít she with Mike and Zara?

No, the older lady in their car is most likely their nanny. I spotted a lot of nannies sitting inbetween kids in the back seat. I saw the Wessex nanny in between Louise and James and I spotted the nanny of Maud and Isabella Windsor in between them too.

Why do Louise and James still have a nanny?  Crazy.

Their still under 18, their parent travel and have evening engagements, their grandparents are older and have their own work, their aunts and uncles are busy and canít pitch in, working for royals involve a lot of background/security checks so sitters are out, etc.

The cousins all had nannies until college.  And at this age it is more just an adult presence than anything else.


I understand the need for a nanny when the parents are away; however, there is literally no legitimate reason why these older children need a nanny to accompany them to a family event where their parents and other adult relatives are present.  It's not like they need assistance cutting their food or using the toilet.  Roll Eyes 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 195 196 [197] 198 199   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: