that the press and other media (the media) fulfil an essential role in a democratic society, which is expressed inter alia in the right to freedom of expression, which, like the right to respect for family life, is laid down in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
*Lol* I wonder, how one is following the convention on protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, if one
a) is forcing a task upon on a little child. So that is has to be the heir of a country and canīt make an own choice about life
b) is self arranging all these photoshootings and is bringing children to public happenings, where they are treated like animals in the zoo.
Again the famous cake, you canīt have and eat
and her trials
. These two words are lighting a rocket in my brain
If I want privacy for my children, I donīt hang around at "IT places" for vacation. And the way her 3 elder children are behaving these days. grrrr "No, we are private ppl, but pls. photograph me in this ooooglly Chanel rag"
I can only guess, that the judges making these decisions had no idea about Miss Hannoverīs double standards and just saw "awwwwww-poor little children" Or they were afraid, that Ernstie would kill someone of the journalists in the long run
So I can just say, that I hope this agreement will be hurt more often by the dutch press. For me it is freedom of speech to get a picture, that is different to the fake posed ones.
Otherwise things have such a disgusting smack of dicatorship and brain washing methods. After all the children are "used" as public persons already.